Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Patient report on information given, consultation time and safety in primary care
Free
  1. José Joaquín Mira1,2,
  2. Cristina Nebot3,
  3. Susana Lorenzo4,
  4. Virtudes Pérez-Jover2
  1. 1Sexual and Reproductive Health, Centro Salud Hospital-Plá, Alicante, Spain
  2. 2Health Psychology Department, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Elche, Spain
  3. 3Patient Affairs Department, Consellería de Sanitat, Valencia, Spain
  4. 4Quality Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
  1. Correspondence to Professor José Joaquín Mira, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Avda. Universidad s/n, Elche 03202, Alicante, Spain; jose.mira{at}umh.es

Abstract

Objective To analyse the frequency of adverse events to treatment reported by patients in relation to consultation time, attention from their usual doctor and information provided by their doctor about treatment.

Design Descriptive study. Patients were invited to respond to a telephone survey.

Setting 21 Primary Care health centres in Spain.

Participants 15 282 patients attended by GPs or paediatricians (error of 1% for p=q=0.50, α 95%) were selected at random from the total consultations recorded in 1 month. For sampling, quotas were assigned for type of attention, age and sex. In the case of children (under 14 years), the survey was answered by their parents.

Main outcome measures Patients' report on frequency of unexpected or adverse reaction to a treatment; whether informed or not about possible complications of the treatment and precautions to take; consultation time; and whether or not patient is usually seen by the same doctor.

Results 1557 (17.6%, CI 95% 16.8 to 18.4%) of the adults and 867 (13.7%, 95% CI 12.8 to 14.5%) of the children reported adverse or unexpected reactions to the treatment according to patients' reports. Consultation time (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.5), doctor rotation at the health centre (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.85 to 2.25) and information on treatment precautions (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.53) determine the higher risk of adverse reactions to treatment.

Conclusions Planning at health centres should involve the monitoring of mean consultation time and doctor rotation as indirect indicators of safety. Furthermore, protocols related to the information provided to patients should be reviewed.

  • Patient safety
  • physician–patient relationship
  • healthcare quality
  • consultation
  • patient report
  • decision making
  • patient-centred

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Preliminary results of this study were presented at the 24th ISQua International Conference. Boston (USA), in October 2007.

  • Funding Spanish Health Research Fund (Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias), reference PI06-90043. c/ Sinesio Delgado, 6 Madrid 28029.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Obtained from the parents.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.