Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Postmarket medical device safety: moving beyond voluntary reporting
Free
  1. Frederic S Resnic,
  2. Arjun Majithia
  1. Cardiovascular Medicine, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Burlington, MA, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Frederic S Resnic, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine; frederic.resnic{at}lahey.org

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Assuring public safety after widespread adoption of medical devices is critically important, and has been identified as a priority by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).1 Growing public concern regarding postmarket safety of medical devices stems in part from an increasing recognition that medical device failure, although infrequent, may lead to injury. Regulatory agencies, such as FDA, are faced with the competing pressures of ensuring patient safety while simultaneously improving the efficiency of medical device approval. Unfortunately, premarket medical device approval studies are frequently limited by small sample size, restricted patient and provider populations, and inadequate duration of follow-up.2 3 Therefore, strengthening approaches of postmarket safety evaluation are increasingly important.

The FDA strategy for postmarket safety evaluation has relied extensively on reporting of adverse events by physicians, patients and device manufacturers through the Medical Device Reporting system. It has become increasingly apparent that, despite a vested interested in …

View Full Text

Linked Articles