Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Minor flow disruptions, traffic-related factors and their effect on major flow disruptions in the operating room
  1. Anjali Joseph1,2,
  2. Amin Khoshkenar2,3,
  3. Kevin M Taaffe2,3,
  4. Ken Catchpole2,4,
  5. Herminia Machry1,2,
  6. Sara Bayramzadeh1
  7. RIPCHD.OR study group
  1. 1 School of Architecture, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA
  2. 2 Center for Health Facilities Design and Testing, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
  3. 3 Department of Industrial Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA
  4. 4 Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, South Carolina, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Anjali Joseph, School of Architecture, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA; anjalij{at}clemson.edu

Abstract

Background Studies in operating rooms (OR) show that minor disruptions tend to group together to result in serious adverse events such as surgical errors. Understanding the characteristics of these minor flow disruptions (FD) that impact major events is important in order to proactively design safer systems

Objective The purpose of this study is to use a systems approach to investigate the aetiology of minor and major FDs in ORs in terms of the people involved, tasks performed and OR traffic, as well as the location of FDs and other environmental characteristics of the OR that may contribute to these disruptions.

Methods Using direct observation and classification of FDs via video recordings of 28 surgical procedures, this study modelled the impact of a range of system factors—location of minor FDs, roles of staff members involved in FDs, type of staff activities as well as OR traffic-related factors—on major FDs in the OR.

Results The rate of major FDs increases as the rate of minor FDs increases, especially in the context of equipment-related FDs, and specific physical locations in the OR. Circulating nurse-related minor FDs and minor FDs that took place in the transitional zone 2, near the foot of the surgical table, were also related to an increase in the rate of major FDs. This study also found that more major and minor FDs took place in the anaesthesia zone compared with all other OR zones. Layout-related disruptions comprised more than half of all observed FDs.

Conclusion Room design and layout issues may create barriers to task performance, potentially contributing to the escalation of FDs in the OR.

  • surgery
  • healthcare quality improvement
  • patient safety
  • interruptions
  • physical environment
  • built environment

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors The authors are the sole contributors of all text, images and tables included in the manuscript.

  • Funding The study was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (P30HS024380, 2015).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Ethics approval Medical University of South Carolina.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Collaborators Scott Reeves, David Allison, Sara Riggs, James Abernathy, Dee San, David Neyens, Larry Fredendall, Yann Ferrand, Deborah Wingler, Katie Jurawicz, Scott Betza, Brandon Lee, Roxana Jafarifirozabadi, Zahra Zamani

Linked Articles