Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Does removing financial incentives lead to declines in performance? A controlled interrupted time series analysis of Medicare Advantage Star Ratings programme performance
  1. Rachel Orler Reid1,2,3,
  2. Mallika Kommareddi4,
  3. Susan M Paddock5,
  4. Cheryl L Damberg4
  1. 1RAND Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  2. 2Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  3. 3Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  4. 4RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA
  5. 5NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Rachel Orler Reid, RAND Health Care, RAND Corporation, Boston, MA 02116, USA; rreid{at}rand.org

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Introduction

Incentive programmes are used in health systems worldwide to spur improvement in quality of care; these include both financial incentives (eg, pay for performance) and non-financial incentives (eg, public reporting). In the USA, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) Star Ratings quality incentive programme for private Medicare insurance plans, or Medicare Advantage plans, incorporates both non-financial and financial incentives. Star Ratings on a 1–5 scale are publicly reported on the Medicare Plan Finder website. Owing to provisions in the March 2010 Affordable Care Act and a demonstration programme, since 2012 Quality Bonus Payments of more than $3 billion annually have been paid directly to plans on the basis of the Star Ratings achieved the year before, which reflects care delivered to the plan’s enrollees 1–2 years prior.1

The Star Ratings incorporate measures from various sources (eg, Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS), Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Health Outcomes Survey (HOS)). CMS has added and removed Star Ratings measures over time; removed measures are still monitored and published on cms.gov, but no longer contribute to bonus payments to plans and are not publicly reported to consumers on the Medicare Plan Finder website. Thus, both financial and non-financial incentives are removed when measures are removed from the Star Ratings methodology.

Studies of pay-for-performance programmes in the UK and the USA in which incentives paid directly to healthcare providers or facilities were removed have shown mixed results as to whether performance was sustained or declined after removal of incentives.2–6 No prior study has assessed performance on measures removed from CMS’s Medicare Advantage Star Ratings incentive programme for insurance plans. As policymakers face pressure to reduce measurement burdens on providers, it is important to understand what happens to performance after measures are deincentivised.

Methods

We performed an observational …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter @RachOReid

  • Funding This work was supported through a contract funded by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (HHSM-500-2016-00079G).

  • Disclaimer The content and opinions expressed in this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not reflect the official position of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services or the US Department of Health and Human Services.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement All study data are are publically available on CMS.gov.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.