Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Impact of altering referral threshold from out-of-hours primary care to hospital on patient safety and further health service use: a cohort study
  1. Ellen Rabben Svedahl1,
  2. Kristine Pape1,
  3. Bjarne Austad1,
  4. Gunnhild Åberge Vie1,
  5. Kjartan Sarheim Anthun2,
  6. Fredrik Carlsen3,
  7. Neil M Davies4,5,
  8. Johan Håkon Bjørngaard1,6
  1. 1Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
  2. 2Department of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway
  3. 3Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
  4. 4MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  5. 5Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  6. 6Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Levanger, Norway
  1. Correspondence to Dr Ellen Rabben Svedahl, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Trondheim, Trøndelag, Norway; ellen.r.svedahl{at}ntnu.no

Abstract

Objectives To estimate the impact of altering referral thresholds from out-of-hours services on older patients’ further use of health services and risk of death.

Design Cohort study using patient data from primary and specialised health services and demographic data from Statistics Norway and the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry.

Setting Norway

Participants 491 653 patients aged 65 years and older contacting Norwegian out-of-hours services between 2008 and 2016.

Analysis Multivariable adjusted and instrumental variable associations between referrals to hospital from out-of-hours services and further health services use and death for up to 6 months.

Physicians’ proportions of acute referrals of older, unknown patients from out-of-hours work were used as an instrumental variable (‘physician referral preference’) for their threshold of referral for such patients whose clinical presentations were less clear cut.

Results For older patients, whose referrals could be attributed to their physicians’ threshold for referral, mean length of stay in hospital increased 3.30 days (95% CI 3.13 to 3.27) within the first 10 days, compared with non-referred patients. Such referrals also increased 6 months use of outpatient specialist clinics and primary care physicians. Importantly, patients with referrals attributable to their physicians’ threshold had a substantially reduced risk of death the first 10 days (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.91), an effect sustaining through the 6-month follow-up period (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.97).

Conclusions Out-of-hours patients whose referrals are affected by physician referral threshold contribute substantially to the use of health services. However, the referral seems protective by reducing the risk of death in the first 6 months after the referral. Thus, raising the threshold for referral to lower pressure on overcrowded emergency departments and hospitals should not be encouraged without ensuring the accuracy of the referral decisions, ideally through high-quality randomised controlled trial evidence.

  • decision making
  • patient safety
  • primary care
  • health policy

Data availability statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors I, the Submitting Author (ERS) has the right to grant and does grant on behalf of all authors of the Work (as defined in the below author licence), an exclusive licence and/or a non-exclusive licence for contributions from authors who are: (i) UK Crown employees; (ii) where BMJ has agreed a CC-BY licence shall apply and/or (iii) in accordance with the terms applicable for US Federal Government officers or employees acting as part of their official duties; on a worldwide, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free basis to BMJ Publishing Group Ltd (“BMJ”) its licensees and where the relevant Journal is co-owned by BMJ to the co-owners of the Journal, to publish the Work in this journal and any other BMJ products and to exploit all rights, as set out in our licence. The Submitting Author accepts and understands that any supply made under these terms is made by BMJ to the Submitting Author unless you are acting as an employee on behalf of your employer or a postgraduate student of an affiliated institution which is paying any applicable article publishing charge (“APC”) for Open Access articles. Where the Submitting Author wishes to make the Work available on an Open Access basis (and intends to pay the relevant APC), the terms of reuse of such Open Access shall be governed by a Creative Commons licence—details of these licences and which Creative Commons licence will apply to this Work are set out in our licence referred to above. Other than as permitted in any relevant BMJ Author’s Self Archiving Policies, I confirm this Work has not been accepted for publication elsewhere, is not being considered for publication elsewhere and does not duplicate material already published. I confirm all authors consent to publication of this Work and authorise the granting of this licence. I accept full responsibility for the work and/or the conduct of the study, I had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

Linked Articles