Article info
PDFResearch and reporting methodology
Grand rounds in methodology: when are realist reviews useful, and what does a ‘good’ realist review look like?
- Correspondence to Dr Geoff Wong, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK; geoffrey.wong{at}phc.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Grand rounds in methodology: when are realist reviews useful, and what does a ‘good’ realist review look like?
Publication history
- Received July 9, 2022
- Accepted December 7, 2022
- First published December 29, 2022.
Online issue publication
May 12, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (28 February 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.