RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Quantifying distraction and interruption in urological surgery
JF Quality and Safety in Health Care
JO Qual Saf Health Care
FD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
SP 135
OP 139
DO 10.1136/qshc.2006.019711
VO 16
IS 2
A1 A N Healey
A1 C P Primus
A1 M Koutantji
YR 2007
UL http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/16/2/135.abstract
AB Background: To enhance safety in surgery, it is necessary to develop a variety of tools for measuring and evaluating the system of work. One important consideration for safety in any high-risk work is the frequency and effect of distraction and interruption. Aim: To quantify distraction and interruption to the sterile surgical team in urology. Methods: Observation of the behaviour of the surgical team and their task activity determined distraction and interruption recorded. Using an ordinal scale, an observer rated each salient distraction or interruption observed in relation to the team’s involvement. Results: The frequency of events and their attached ratings were high, deriving from varying degrees of equipment, procedure and environment problems, telephones, bleepers and conversations. Discussion: With further refinement and testing, this method may be useful for distinguishing ordinal levels of work interference in surgery and helpful in raising awareness of its origin for postoperative surgical team debriefing.