RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Why traditional statistical process control charts for attribute data should be viewed alongside an xmr-chart JF BMJ Quality & Safety JO BMJ Qual Saf FD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd SP 263 OP 269 DO 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001324 VO 22 IS 3 A1 Mohammed, Mohammed A A1 Worthington, Peter YR 2013 UL http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/22/3/263.abstract AB The use of statistical process control (SPC) charts in healthcare is increasing. The general advice when plotting SPC charts is to begin by selecting the right chart. This advice, in the case of attribute data, may be limiting our insights into the underlying process and consequently be potentially misleading. Given the general lack of awareness that additional insights may be obtained by using more than one SPC chart, there is a need to review this issue and make some recommendations. Under purely common cause variation the control limits on the xmr-chart and traditional attribute charts (eg, p-chart, c-chart, u-chart) will be in close agreement, indicating that the observed variation (xmr-chart) is consistent with the underlying Binomial model (p-chart) or Poisson model (c-chart, u-chart). However, when there is a material difference between the limits from the xmr-chart and the attribute chart then this also constitutes a signal of an underlying systematic special cause of variation. We use one simulation and two case studies to demonstrate these ideas and show the utility of plotting the SPC chart for attribute data alongside an xmr-chart. We conclude that the combined use of attribute charts and xmr-charts, which requires little additional effort, is a useful strategy because it is less likely to mislead us and more likely to give us the insight to do the right thing.