TY - JOUR T1 - Comparing the utility of a novel neonatal resuscitation cart with a generic code cart using simulation: a randomised, controlled, crossover trial JF - BMJ Quality & Safety JO - BMJ Qual Saf SP - 124 LP - 129 DO - 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001336 VL - 22 IS - 2 AU - Ritu Chitkara AU - Anand K Rajani AU - Henry C Lee AU - Sara F Snyder Hansen AU - Louis P Halamek Y1 - 2013/02/01 UR - http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/22/2/124.abstract N2 - Objective To compare a novel neonatal resuscitation cart (NRC) to a generic code cart (GCC). Study design A prospective, randomised, controlled, crossover trial was performed to compare the utility of the NRC with the GCC during simulated deliveries of extremely low birthweight infants and infants with gastroschisis. Fifteen subjects participated. Mean times and accuracy of equipment and supply retrieval were compared for each scenario using the Wilcoxon test. Results Mean acquisition times for the NRC were always faster (by 58% to 74%) regardless of scenario (p<0.01). Accuracy of equipment selection did not differ. Ease of use was judged using a Likert scale (1=easiest to use; 5=most difficult), with mean score for NRC 1.1 and GCC 3.7 (p<0.0001). All subjects rated the NRC as easier to use. Conclusions The NRC was superior to the GCC in acquisition speed, supply selection and ease of use. ER -