RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Defining impact of a rapid response team: qualitative study with nurses, physicians and hospital administrators
JF BMJ Quality & Safety
JO BMJ Qual Saf
FD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
SP bmjqs-2011-000390
DO 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000390
A1 Andrea L Benin
A1 Christopher P Borgstrom
A1 Grace Y Jenq
A1 Sarah A Roumanis
A1 Leora I Horwitz
YR 2012
UL http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/early/2012/03/01/bmjqs-2011-000390.abstract
AB Objective The objective of this study was to qualitatively describe the impact of a Rapid Response Team (RRT) at a 944-bed, university-affiliated hospital.Methods We analysed 49 open-ended interviews with administrators, primary team attending physicians, trainees, RRT attending hospitalists, staff nurses, nurses and respiratory technicians.Results Themes elicited were categorised into the domains of (1) morale and teamwork, (2) education, (3) workload, (4) patient care, and (5) hospital administration. Positive implications beyond improved care for acutely ill patients were: increased morale and empowerment among nurses, real-time redistribution of workload for nurses (reducing neglect of non-acutely ill patients during emergencies), and immediate access to expert help. Negative implications were: increased tensions between nurses and physician teams, a burden on hospitalist RRT members, and reduced autonomy for trainees.Conclusions The RRT provides advantages that extend well beyond a reduction in rates of transfers to intensive care units or codes but are balanced by certain disadvantages. The potential impact from these multiple sources should be evaluated to understand the utility of any RRT programme.