PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Starmer, Amy
AU  - O'Toole, Jennifer
AU  - Spector, Nancy
AU  - West, Daniel
AU  - Sectish, Theodore
AU  - Schnipper, Jeffrey
AU  - Srivastava, Rajendu
AU  - Goldstein, Jenna
AU  - Campos, Maria-Lucia
AU  - Howell, Eric
AU  - Landrigan, Christopher
AU  - ,
TI  - MENTORED IMPLEMENTATION OF THE I-PASS HANDOFF PROGRAM IN DIVERSE CLINICAL ENVIRONMENTS
AID  - 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-IHIabstracts.23
DP  - 2016 Dec 01
TA  - BMJ Quality & Safety
PG  - 1009--1010
VI  - 25
IP  - 12
4099  - http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/25/12/1009.short
4100  - http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/25/12/1009.full
SO  - BMJ Qual Saf2016 Dec 01; 25
AB  - Background Handoff miscommunications are a leading source of medical errors. Error rates decreased following implementation of the I-PASS handoff program (a bundled intervention using a structured mnemonic, I-PASS, and other initiatives to sustain implementation) in a pediatric research trial. Whether I-PASS can be implemented in settings outside academic pediatric institutions is unknown.Objectives To implement I-PASS in a variety of hospitals and medical specialties using a mentored process. (2) To measure the association of I-PASS implementation with handoff quality and provider-reported medical error rates.Methods We implemented I-PASS in 16 hospitals [community (n=5), academic (n=11)] and multiple specialties [internal medicine (n=7), pediatrics (n=3), other (n=6)]. We paired each site with an external mentorship team of I-PASS experts that conducted a site visit and provided ongoing coaching. Site leads participated in program wide webinars and shared data with participating sites. Validated handoff observation tools and a provider survey assessed handoff quality and rates of adverse events.Results Implementation was associated with increased inclusion of all 5 I-PASS mnemonic elements for both verbal (14% vs 70%) and written (0% vs 81%) handoffs. Additionally, increases were noted in the frequency of high quality verbal (44% vs 81%) and written (49% vs 73%) patient summaries, verbal (22% vs 82%) and written (44% vs 72%) contingency plans, and verbal receiver syntheses (4% vs 81%). Adverse events decreased by 27%. All changes statistically significant. Improvements were similar across provider types and settings.Conclusions The I-PASS Handoff program is associated with improved handoff communication in a variety of settings and provider types.⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓Figure 1 Verbal Handoff Assessments: adherence to all 5 mnemonic elements.Figure 2 Written Handoff Assessments: adherence to all 5 mnemonic elements.Figure 3 Verbal Handoff Assessments: quality of patient summaries.Figure 4 Written Handoff Assessments: quality of patient summaries.Figure 5 Verbal Handoff Assessments: quality of contigency plans.Figure 6 Written Handoff Assessments: quality of contigency plans.Figure 7 Verbal Handoff Assessments: quality of synthesis by receiver.Figure 8 Provider-reported adverse event rate.