PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Anthony D Bai
AU  - Siddhartha Srivastava
AU  - George A Tomlinson
AU  - Christopher A Smith
AU  - Chaim M Bell
AU  - Sudeep S Gill
TI  - Mortality of hospitalised internal medicine patients bedspaced to non-internal medicine inpatient units: retrospective cohort study
AID  - 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006925
DP  - 2018 Jan 01
TA  - BMJ Quality & Safety
PG  - 11--20
VI  - 27
IP  - 1
4099  - http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/27/1/11.short
4100  - http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/27/1/11.full
SO  - BMJ Qual Saf2018 Jan 01; 27
AB  - Objective To compare inhospital mortality of general internal medicine (GIM) patients bedspaced to off-service wards with GIM inpatients admitted to assigned GIM wards.Method A retrospective cohort study of consecutive GIM admissions between 1 January 2015 and 1 January 2016 was conducted at a large tertiary care hospital in Canada.Inhospital mortality was compared between patients admitted to off-service wards (bedspaced) and assigned GIM wards using a Cox proportional hazards model and a competing risk model. Sensitivity analyses included propensity score and pair matching based on GIM service team, workload, demographics, time of admission, reasons for admission and comorbidities.Results Among 3243 consecutive GIM admissions, more than a third (1125, 35%) were bedspaced to off-service wards with the rest (2118, 65%) admitted to assigned GIM wards. In hospital, 176 (5%) patients died: 88/1125 (8%) bedspaced patients and 88/2118 (4%) assigned GIM ward patients. Compared with assigned GIM wards patients, bedspaced patients had an HR of 3.42 (95% CI 2.23 to 5.26; P<0.0001) for inhospital mortality at admission, which then decreased by HR of 0.97 (95% CI 0.94 to 0.99; P=0.0133) per day in hospital. Competing risk models and sensitivity analyses using propensity scores and pair matching yielded similar results.Conclusions Bedspaced patients had significantly higher inhospital mortality than patients admitted to assigned GIM wards. The risk was highest at admission and subsequently declined. The results of this single centre study may not be generalisable to other hospitals and may be influenced by residual confounding. Despite these limitations, the relationship between bedspacing and patient outcomes requires investigation at other institutions to determine if this common practice represents a modifiable patient safety indicator.