Responses to questionnaire statements
Statement | Mean | Median | Scores* | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
AE = adverse event. | |||||||
*The MRF2 was rated on a 5 point scale: 1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = no opinion; 4 = agree; 5 = strongly agree. | |||||||
The review form is comprehensive | 3.92 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 1 |
The review form is well structured | 3.58 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 2 |
The review terminology is clear | 3.42 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 1 |
The modular structure is useful | 3.92 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 3 |
The amount of explanation and instruction on the form itself is about right | 3.42 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 1 |
The accompanying separate instructions are helpful | 3.67 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 1 |
The range of options for each section is sufficient | 3.97 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 2 |
The review form records sufficient patient information | 3.83 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 3 |
The review form records sufficient detail about problems in process of care | 3.67 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 |
The review form records sufficient detail about the impact of AE | 3.75 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 3 |
The review form records sufficient detail about the causes of AE | 3.58 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 3 |
The information on the review form has the potential to lead to meaningful clinical improvements | 3.58 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 1 |