Table 4

 Other characteristics of stroke units (n = 175) from the National Stroke Audit, 2001–2

% (n)
Routine access to specialist nursing for:
    Continence advice65% (n = 113)
    Pressure sore prevention76% (n = 133)
    Stroke care69% (n = 121)
Social worker attached to multidisciplinary team63% (n = 111)
In-house training for:
    Qualified staff74% (n = 129)
    Unqualified staff64% (n = 112)
All professions contribute to a single set of notes54% (n = 94)
Team meetings at least once a week for interchange of information about individual patients82% (n = 144)
Disciplines which regularly attend team meetings
    Clinical psychology13% (n = 23)
    Dietetics37% (n = 64)
    Medicine (senior doctor)81% (n = 142)
    Nursing84% (n = 147)
    Occupational therapy82% (n = 144)
    Physiotherapy83% (n = 145)
    Social work59% (n = 103)
    Speech and language therapy63% (n = 111)
Reference information on functional tools used locally69% (n = 121)
Practice guidelines on
    Clinical management of stroke77% (n = 135)
    Continence management70% (n = 123)
    Swallowing difficulties81% (n = 141)
    Pressure area care82% (n = 143)
Up to date information on local and national patients’/carers’support organisations79% (n = 139)
Records of all patient’s management in acute phase80% (n = 140)
Patient access to management plan62% (n = 108)
Patient information literature displayed in unit on
    Condition specific literature on stroke85% (n = 148)
    Patient versions of national or local guidelines/standards43% (n = 76)
    Social services local community care arrangements58% (n = 102)
    The Benefits Agency56% (n = 98)
    Local voluntary agencies70% (n = 122)
    How to complain78% (n = 136)