Declared knowledge of methods and tools related to quality management and involvement in quality management activities
Experimental departments | Control departments | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Trained staff(n = 93) | Untrained staff(n = 97) | Untrained staff(n = 96) | p value | |
Declared knowledge of quality process(good or very good) (%) | 86.0 | 34.1 | 33.3 | <0.01 |
Knowledge of methods (good or very good) (%) | ||||
Continuous quality improvement | 62.4 | 19.8 | 16.5 | <0.01 |
Quality assurance | 58.7 | 22.9 | 11.7 | <0.01 |
Knowledge of tools (good or very good) (%) | ||||
Writing procedures | 87.0 | 43.3 | 44.7 | <0.01 |
Reporting incidents and failures | 78.5 | 41.2 | 21.3 | <0.01 |
Brainstorming | 67.8 | 16.5 | 11.7 | <0.01 |
Process analysis | 60.9 | 13.4 | 8.0 | <0.01 |
Cause/effect diagram (Ishikawa) | 57.0 | 6.2 | 6.5 | <0.01 |
Quality indicators | 51.6 | 8.2 | 6.5 | <0.01 |
Pareto’s diagram | 53.8 | 3.1 | 5.3 | <0.01 |
Involved in quality process (%) | 89.3 | 48.9 | 65.6 | <0.01 |
Participation in activities (%) | ||||
Quality work group (⩾5 meetings) | 76.3 | 6.3 | 14.0 | <0.01 |
Writing guidelines | 88.2 | 36.5 | 53.8 | <0.01 |
Incidents and failures in management | 71.0 | 43.6 | 28.1 | <0.01 |
Process analysis | 73.1 | 20.2 | 10.1 | <0.01 |
Assessment of practices | 29.3 | 5.3 | 11.1 | <0.01 |