Narrative interview | Researcher collects the stories of service users and/or the people involved in the quality improvement initiative | Individual narrative, analysed for structure, coherence, and meaning in a particular social context | Unstructured or semi-structured interview | Insights into individual experiences in the hands of the organisation/system | Patients’ experiences of dying of heart failure or lung cancer12 |
| | | | | |
Naturalistic story gathering | Researcher becomes a field worker immersed in the organisation so as to collect “real” stories in informal space and interpret them in context | Organisational subgroup, e.g. junior nurses. Analysed for subtleties in individuals’ and groups’ different interpretations of the same event/action over time | Ethnography | Thick description of organisational culture and how it influences particular behaviours and choices of individuals | Nurses’ experience of introduction of computerised records (involved both formal interviews and informal story-gathering)49 |
| | | | | |
Organisational case study | Researcher presents an account of the quality improvement initiative in the form of a detailed story | “The case” (perhaps the organisation), analysed for complex and dynamic influences on key events and processes | Multiple qualitative and quantitative methods e.g. interviews,questionnaires,documentary analysis | Detailed description of “the case” as a context for events,plus chronological account of particular events as they unfolded during the study | Impact of learning facilitators on organisational change34 |
| | | | | |
Collective sense-making | Researcher joins quality improvement team and works with them to develop a shared perspective on the problem and its causes, and to plan and implement action | Change team analysed for development and enaction of shared meanings/purpose | Action research | Action intended to change (“organisational drama”) | Action research study of quality improvement in a “failing” hospital trust45 |