Application of RE-AIM framework to study intervention
| Reach: % of target population that participated in this intervention |
| % of surgical departments that received software |
| % of surgical departments reporting adverse outcomes in 2002 |
| Efficacy: success rate if implemented as in protocol |
| % of surgical departments sending in information to national database over period 2000–2 |
| % of surgical departments intending to send information to national database over the year 2003 |
| Adoption: % of settings that will adopt this intervention |
| % of surgical departments willing to implement reporting system |
| % of surgical departments unwilling because of own reporting system |
| Implementation: extent to which intervention is implemented |
| % of surgical departments with successful implementation of reporting system in 2003 |
| % of surgical departments without implementation in 2002 but with successful implementation in 2003 |
| % of surgical departments experiencing problems with implementation in 2003 |
| % of surgical departments with need for support beyond 2003 |
| Maintenance: extent to which a program is sustained over time |
| % of surgical departments with successful implementation in 2002 that maintained implementation in 2003 |
| % of surgical departments with successful implementation in 2002 that lost implementation in 2003 |
| Reasons for loss of implementation |