Evaluation of implementation of national reporting system of adverse outcomes in surgical patients using the RE-AIM framework
| Measure for improvement | No (%) |
|---|---|
| Reach: % of target population that participated in this intervention | |
| % of surgical departments that received software | 109 (100%) |
| % of surgical departments reporting adverse outcomes in 2002 | 102 (93.6%) |
| Efficacy: success rate if implemented as in protocol | |
| % of surgical departments sending in information to national database over period 2000–2 | 6 (5.5%) |
| % of surgical departments intending to send information to national database over the year 2003 | 22 (20.2%) |
| Adoption: % of settings that will adopt this intervention | |
| % of surgical departments willing to implement reporting system | 93 (85.3%) |
| % of surgical departments unwilling because of own reporting system | 11 (10.1%) |
| Implementation: extent to which intervention is implemented | |
| % of surgical departments with successful implementation of reporting system in 2003 | 37 (33.9%) |
| % of surgical departments without implementation in 2002 but with successful implementation in 2003 | 21 (19.3%) |
| % of surgical departments experiencing problems with implementation in 2003 | 50 (45.9%) |
| % of surgical departments with need for support beyond 2003 | 78 (71.6%) |
| Maintenance: extent to which a program is sustained over time | |
| % of surgical departments that maintained implementation in period 2002–3 | 16 (14.7%) |
| % of surgical departments that lost implementation in 2003 | 4 (3.6%) |