Table 1 Compliance with audit criteria*
Audit criterionPeriod
4th quarter 20031st quarter 20042nd quarter 2004Follow-upp Value
Patient wearing wristband81.8%96.2%99.6%98.8%<0.001
75.9%–86.7%93.1%–98.2%97.8%–100%96.6%–99.8%
175/214253/263254/255250/253
Check of patient identity performed62.6%81.7%88.2%81.4%<0.001
55.8%–69.1%76.5%–86.2%83.6%–91.9%76.1%–86.0%
134/214215/263225/255206/253
Identity data obtained from open question to patient53.0%71.2%72.0%77.7%<0.001
44.2%–61.7%64.6%–77.1%65.6%–77.8%71.4%–83.2%
71/134153/215162/225160/206
All identity data (first and last names, date of birth) obtained19.4%50.2%73.8%70.9%<0.001
13.1%–27.1%43.4%–57.1%67.5%–79.4%64.2%–77.0%
26/134108/215166/225146/206
Check complete (identity data compared with all three information sources: patient’s wristband, operating theatre schedule and patient’s record)41.0%70.7%90.7%82.5%<0.001
32.6%–49.9%64.1%–76.7%86.1%–94.1%76.6%–87.4%
55/134152/215204/225170/206
Full compliance with protocol when performing patient identity check9.7%38.1%59.1%58.7%<0.001
5.3%–16.0%31.6%–45.0%52.4%–65.6%51.7%–65.5%
13/13482/215133/225121/206
Surgical site signed75.8%78.3%81.5%86.4%0.08
68.2%–82.4%71.7%–84.0%74.9%–87.0%80.4%–91.1%
116/153148/189141/173152/176
Check of surgical site performed77.1%92.6%90.2%94.3%<0.001
69.6%–83.5%87.9%–95.9%84.7%–94.2%89.8%–97.2%
118/153175/189156/173166/176
Surgical site information obtained from open question to patient57.6%73.1%80.1%84.9%<0.001
48.2%–66.7%65.9%–79.6%73.0%–86.1%78.6%–90.0%
68/118128/175125/156141/166
Check complete (site of surgery data compared with all three information sources: surgeon’s check, operating theatre schedule, and patient’s record)51.7%67.4%76.9%74.7%<0.001
42.3%–61.0%59.9%–74.3%69.5%–83.3%67.4%–81.1%
61/118118/175120/156124/166
Full compliance with protocol when performing site of surgery check32.2%52.0%64.7%63.3%<0.001
23.9%–41.4%44.3%–59.6%56.7%–72.2%55.4%–70.6%
38/11891/175101/156105/166
  • *For each variable, the data from top to bottom are: proportion of observations satisfying audit criterion; 95% confidence interval; and the number of observations complying with audit criterion/total number of observations requiring compliance with audit criterion.