Table 3

Perceived factors influencing QI objectives

Factorn (%) responding 4 or 5 on scale from 1 (very little) to 5 (very much)Discrepancy in view of “does” and “should” (p value)*
DoShould
Senior management58 (89.2)60 (95.2)0.118
National accrediting body57 (89.1)51 (82.3)0.344
Adverse events55 (85.9)58 (93.6)0.227
Internal performance data51 (79.7)61 (98.4)0.001
Your recommendations53 (82.8)50 (80.7)1.000
Hospital programme priorities51 (79.7)54 (88.5)0.146
Management and staff48 (75.0)57 (91.9)0.006
Hospital board48 (73.9)53 (84.1)0.118
Ministry of Health46 (71.9)38 (62.3)0.118
Safer healthcare now45 (70.3)52 (83.9)0.008
External performance data42 (65.6)61 (98.4)0.003
Patient recommendations42 (65.6)61 (98.4)<0.001
Physician champion39 (60.0)54 (87.1)<0.001
Other clinician33 (51.6)46 (74.2)0.001
Physicians30 (46.2)51 (83.6)<0.001
Published research28 (44.4)45 (73.8)<0.001
Health region22 (34.4)37 (59.7)0.001
Other certification body18 (28.6)22 (36.7)0.687
External consultants12 (18.5)14 (22.2)0.727
External researchers11 (17.2)25 (40.3)0.001
  • * McNemar's test.