Table 6 Retrospective record review studies on the occurrence of (preventable) AEs of hospitalised patients between 1984 and 2005
StudySettingAdmissions with ⩾1 AE*% (95% CI)AEs that were preventable†% (95% CI)AEs that were associated with death% (95% CI)Admissions associated with potentially preventable death (%)
Present study21 Dutch hospitals, 7926 hospital admissions (2004)5.7 (5.1 to 6.4)39.67.60.12
Andres et al1924 Spanish hospitals, 5624 hospital admissions (2005)8.4 (7.7 to 9.1)42.64.40.19 **
Michel et al87 hospitals in France, 778 hospital admissions (2002)14.527.6NRNR
Schioler et al1017 hospitals in Denmark, 1097 hospital admissions (2001)9.040.44.90.178§
Baker et al220 Canadian hospitals, 3745 hospital admissions (2000)7.5 (5.7 to 9.3)36.920.80.66 ¶
Vincent et al122 hospitals in London, England, 1014 hospital admissions (1998)10.84880.41§
Davis et al4 513 hospitals in New Zealand, 6579 hospital admissions (1998)12.937.14.50.28 **
Thomas et al1128 hospitals in Utah and Colorado, 14 700 hospital admissions (1992)2.9 (0.2)***506.60.13 **
Wilson et al1328 hospitals in New South Wales and South Australia, 14 179 hospital admissions (1992)16.6 (15.2 to 17.9)51.24.90.55 **
Brennan et al151 hospitals in New York, 30 195 hospital admissions (1984)3.7 (3.2 to 4.2)27.6‡13.60.26 **
Leape et al3
  • NR, not reported

  • *Most of the studies used causation score ⩾4, except Davis et al45 and Wilson et al.13 They used causation score ⩾2. Not all studies reported 95% CIs.

  • †All studies reported on high preventable AEs (preventability score ⩾4).

  • ‡ Measured negligence instead of preventability.

  • ¶Reported.2

  • §Estimated by calculation: proportion of AEs × proportion of preventable AEs × proportion that contributed to death.

  • **Estimated by calculation: proportion of AEs × proportion of preventable AEs that contributed to death.

  • ***SD.