Evaluation of the ADAPTE process and ADAPTE manual by the participants
| Opinion about the ADAPTE process | %* | n (144)* |
| Clarity | 78 | 113 |
| Comprehensiveness | 69 | 100 |
| Confidence that the process is feasible | 60 | 86 |
| Opinion about the ADAPTE manual | ||
| Clarity | 79 | 114 |
| Usefulness | 79 | 104 |
| Expected benefits from using the ADAPTE process | ||
| Increased quality | 75 | 108 |
| Decreased resource use | 26 | 38 |
| Decreased timeframe | 27 | 39 |
| Expected barriers when using the ADAPTE process | ||
| No guidelines available | 44 | 63 |
| Expected difficulties to adapt source guidelines to context of use | 44 | 64 |
| Low quality of available guidelines | 42 | 60 |
| Difficulties to select from numerous guidelines | 33 | 47 |
| Limited acceptance of the process by guideline panel | 30 | 43 |
| Perceived complexity of the process | 21 | 30 |
↵* Proportions and absolute numbers of participants scoring 5 or 6 on the 6-point Likert scale (strong agreement).