Table 3

Mean percentage of patients with urinary incontinence (UI) diagnoses by availability of quality systems

Quality systemsNo of teams with quality system(s)Raw percentages % (SD)Adjusted estimated mean % of diagnosesMean difference95% CI interval of differencep Value*
Agency level
 A839.3 (17.6)39.38.4−16.7 to 33.50.47
 AB1450.3 (23.1)50.4−2.7−27.2 to 21.80.79
 ACD653.1 (21.0)53.1−5.4−31.4 to 20.70.66
 B1638.3 (21.2)39.38.4−9.2 to 25.90.32
 BCD2240.8 (21.9)41.46.3−12.2 to 24.90.45
 BC151.551.5−3.8−51.0 to 43.30.87
 None (reference)5546.6 (24.6)47.7
Team level
 a552.1 (22.5)54.7−10.3−33.7 to 13.10.39
 ac4047.9 (22.5)48.5−4.1−18.0 to 9.80.56
 abc951.1 (23.9)52.2−7.8−27.0 to 11.40.43
 acd157.158.1−13.7−60.4 to 32.90.56
 abcd751.8 (19.4)52.6−8.1−31.3 to 15.00.48
 b158.360.9−16.4−62.9 to 30.00.49
 bc346.6 (3.0)47.3−2.9−31.1 to 25.30.84
 c3937.1 (22.5)36.87.7−6.6 to 21.90.29
 None (reference)1745.0 (26.3)44.4
  • A, protocol on incontinence; B, updating of protocol; C, continence nurse; D, UI education; a, nurse with special UI focus; b, check as to whether UI protocol is used; c, documentation in patient record, d, UI brochure.

  • * When compared with teams (within home care agencies) without quality systems.