Oversight of the data obtained at first and second Maturity Matrix (MM) sessions
| No of practices to assess the dimension twice | Mean score at MM sessions | Mean Change and p value | No of practices (N) reporting change in MM score | No of practices (N) that prioritised the dimensions and p value of difference in prioritisation | No of practices (N) naming an anchor person for prioritised | ||||||||||||||||
| From first to second MM sessions | |||||||||||||||||||||
| <0=score at second lower than at first | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 0=score at second same as at first | |||||||||||||||||||||
| >0=score at second higher than at first | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Dimensions and p value difference in prioritisation plus anchor person | |||||||||||||||||||||
| <0 | 0 | >0 | First MM sessions | Second MM sessions | First MM sessions | Second MM sessions | |||||||||||||||
| Dimension | N | First | Second | Mean | p Value | N | Percentage | N | Percentage | N | Percentage | N | Percentage | N | Percentage | p Value | N | Percentage | N | Percentage | p Value |
| Clinical data | 48 | 4.1 | 4.7 | 0.6 | 0.003 | 5 | 10% | 19 | 40% | 24 | 50% | 25 | 52% | 20 | 42% | 0.307 | 15 | 60% | 19 | 95% | 0.206 |
| Audit | 48 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 0.5 | 0.018 | 6 | 13% | 23 | 48% | 19 | 40% | 11 | 23% | 10 | 21% | 0.805 | 5 | 45% | 9 | 90% | 0.160 |
| Use of guidelines | 48 | 3.6 | 4.4 | 0.8 | 0.000 | 2 | 4% | 21 | 44% | 25 | 52% | 29 | 60% | 27 | 56% | 0.679 | 12 | 41% | 16 | 59% | 0.660 |
| Clinical information | 48 | 6.3 | 7.1 | 0.8 | 0.000 | 1 | 2% | 19 | 40% | 28 | 58% | 16 | 33% | 9 | 19% | 0.104 | 6 | 38% | 4 | 44% | 0.217 |
| Prescribing | 48 | 5.3 | 5.9 | 0.6 | 0.002 | 3 | 6% | 28 | 58% | 17 | 35% | 24 | 50% | 27 | 56% | 0.540 | 13 | 54% | 15 | 56% | 0.378 |
| Human resource management | 48 | 5.1 | 6.2 | 1.1 | 0.000 | 1 | 2% | 22 | 46% | 25 | 52% | 30 | 63% | 23 | 48% | 0.151 | 14 | 47% | 16 | 70% | 0.404 |
| Continuing Medical Education | 48 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 1.0 | 0.000 | 2 | 4% | 20 | 42% | 26 | 54% | 25 | 52% | 21 | 44% | 0.470 | 12 | 48% | 13 | 62% | 0.186 |
| Practice meetings | 48 | 4.1 | 5.1 | 1.0 | 0.000 | 4 | 8% | 20 | 42% | 24 | 50% | 32 | 67% | 21 | 44% | 0.040 | 15 | 47% | 14 | 67% | 0.665 |
| Patient information | 48 | 5.6 | 6.0 | 0.4 | 0.001 | 1 | 2% | 33 | 69% | 14 | 29% | 11 | 23% | 12 | 25% | 0.766 | 4 | 36% | 6 | 50% | 0.336 |
| Significant events | 43 | 3.8 | 5.2 | 1.4 | 0.000 | 3 | 7% | 17 | 40% | 23 | 53% | 34 | 79% | 22 | 51% | 0.010 | 19 | 56% | 16 | 73% | 1000 |
| Emergencies | 45 | 3.1 | 4.9 | 1.8 | 0.000 | 0 | 0% | 19 | 42% | 26 | 58% | 21 | 47% | 19 | 42% | 0.671 | 12 | 57% | 13 | 68% | 0.814 |
| Learning from patients* | 8 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 0.2 | 0.351 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 88% | 1 | 13% | 2 | 25% | 1 | 13% | 0.715 | 1 | 50% | 1 | 100% | 0.522 |
| 528 | 4.4 | 5.3 | 0.9 | 28 | 5% | 248 | 47% | 252 | 48% | 260 | 49% | 212 | 40% | 128 | 49% | 142 | 67% | ||||
↵* The practices from Frederiksborg County were randomised to one of two different versions of the MM, because of a whish to test the influence of exposure to the dimension significant events on later reporting of events. That led to eight practices using a MM version where significant events were exchanged with learning from patients.