Table 4

Results of the statistical graphical modelling of the model in figure 1, on the basis of the research questions in table 2

Dimension1.2.3.4.5.6.
First score→prioritisingPrioritising→second scoreInterventions between meetings→second scoreInterventions between meetings→prioritisingSize→prioritisingSize→second score
γ*p Value*γp Valueγp Valueγ§p Value§γp Valueγ**p Value**
Clinical data−0.180.1840.220.1930.210.235−0.130.3170.360.119−0.110.387
Audit0.090.333−0.380.1870.130.3400.470.2100.001000−0.380.211
Use of guidelines−0.550.005−0.190.2430.290.2640.660.0150.290.216−0.200.325
Clinical information−0.480.0160.001.000−0.200.397−0.330.1910.480.0730.430.273
Prescribing−0.390.0350.170.3520.200.491−0.190.317−0.280.2360.450.222
Human resource management−0.130.2290.140.2960.140.460−0.400.155−0.060.433−0.080.482
Continuing Medical Education−0.110.297−0.250.2380.330.387−0.710.0090.500.1220.450.119
Practice meetings−0.250.112−0.030.467−0.500.1590.030.4560.140.3700.290.257
Patient information−0.490.046−0.400.4451.000.0250.720.048−0.550.0730.330.523
Significant events−0.330.0780.540.0821.000.044−0.250.1740.330.242−0.200.388
Emergencies−0.110.315−0.100.3790.200.3140.070.4190.670.0790.270.256
Learning from patientsInsufficient data
  • * A negative γ value indicates that a lower score at the first Maturity Matrix (MM) session is associated with prioritising the dimension at first session.

  • A positive γ value indicates that prioritising the dimension at first session leads to change.

  • A positive γ value indicates that (anticipation of) interventions between meetings is associated with change in score from first to second session.

  • § A positive γ value indicates that (anticipation of) interventions between meetings is associated with a higher prioritising.

  • A positive γ value indicates that multiple GPs in the practice are associated with a higher prioritising.

  • ** A positive γ value indicates that multiple GPs in the practice are associated with a higher score at the second MM session.