Table 5

Mean amount of urine loss by availability of quality systems

Quality systemsNo of teams with quality system(s)Unadjusted mean urine lossAdjusted estimated mean urine loss§Mean difference95% CI interval differencep Value*
Agency level
 A91.93 (0.36)1.96−0.55−0.3 to 0.200.66
 AB181.71 (0.31)1.700.20−0.03 to 0.430.08
 ACD72.1 (0.58)2.02−0.12−0.4 to 0.20.39
 BC11.861.92−0.02−0.7 to 0.60.95
 BCD291.90 (0.31)1.91−0.01−0.2 to 0.20.92
 C171.83 (0.27)1.820.08−0.1 to 0.30.41
 D22.17 (0.32)2.16−0.26−0.7 to 0.20.28
 None (reference)721.90 (0.35)1.90
Team level
 a61.84 (0.28)1.860.10−0.2 to 0.40.51
 ab41.97 (0.31)2.05−0.08−0.4 to 0.30.67
 ac481.83 (0.29)1.810.15−0.03 to 0.30.10
 abc111.95 (0.39)1.97−0.001−0.3 to 0.30.99
 acd12.001.98−0.01−0.7 to 0.70.97
 abcd91.96 (0.53)1.920.04−0.2 to 0.30.77
 b11.671.670.3−0.4 to 1.00.40
 bc41.87 (0.23)1.870.1−0.3 to 0.50.60
 c481.87 (0.35)1.900.07−0.1 to 0.30.47
 None (reference)231.95 (0.38)1.97
  • A, protocol on incontinence; B, updating of protocol; C, continence nurse; D, UI education; a, nurse with special UI focus; b, check as to whether UI protocol is used; c, documentation in patient record; d, UI brochure.

  • * When compared with teams (within home care agencies) without quality systems.

  • Adjusted for sex (% female): b=−0.001, p=0.001.

  • Adjusted for sex (% female): b=−0.006, p=0.001.

  • § Range 1–3.