Table 3

Reasons for missed or delayed colorectal cancer follow-up as ascertained by record review

Colorectal cancer triggersFOBT-based trigger
n=78
IDA-based trigger
n=120
Haematochezia-based trigger
n=60
ReasonTotal records
# (%)
Total records
# (%)
Total records
# (%)
Justification documented (false positives)
 Patient declined colonoscopy3 (11.5)2 (5.1)7 (28.0)
 Patient pursued outside care2 (7.7)5 (12.8)1 (4.0)
 Record identified by trigger despite not meeting
 Red flag criteria (data miscoded)
0 (0.0)0 (0.0)13 (52.0)
 Patient identified by trigger despite meeting exclusion or expected follow-up criteria21 (80.8)32 (82.1)4 (16.0)
  Upper GI bleed identified as bleeding source4170
  Prior colonoscopy performed at outside institution1082
  Patient hospitalised at time of red flag diagnostic clue060
  Terminal illness/hospice care202
  Other510
Total with justification documented26 (33.3)39 (32.5)25 (41.7)
No justification documented (true positives)
 No reason/rationale documented15 (28.8)72 (88.9)18 (51.4)
 Colonoscopy ordered by not performed by 60 days34 (65.4)4 (4.9)12 (34.3)
 Inadequate follow-up (eg, subsequent FOBT only)3 (5.8)5 (6.2)5 (14.3)
Total without justification documented (PPV)52 (66.7)81 (67.5)35 (58.3)
  • FOBT, faecal occult blood test; GI, gastrointestinal; IDA, iron deficiency anaemia; PPV, positive predictive value.