Table 2

Performance of six key processes for patients undergoing rapid sequence intubation in a single paediatric emergency department during two periods

Historical (n=114)Testing (n=75)% Difference (95% CI)
Checklist usedn/a*69 (92)
Preoxygenation appropriate†87 (79)62 (84)5 (−7 to 16)
Video laryngoscope usedn/a*63 (84)
Laryngoscopist appropriate‡54 (47)70 (93)46 (34 to 56)
1st attempt ≤45 s81 (72)§64 (85)13 (1 to 24)
ETCO2 used for confirmation¶3 (3)71 (96)93 (82 to 95)
  • Historical=April 2009–March 2010, Testing=July 2012–September 2013.

  • n (%) or % difference shown.

  • *Checklist and video laryngoscope were not in use during the historical period.

  • †>3 min with one of the approved methods; n=110 for historical period, n=74 for intervention period.

  • ‡Paediatric emergency medicine faculty or fellow, anaesthesiology or emergency medicine resident.

  • §n=112.

  • ¶Presence of ETCO2 via capnometry acknowledged on video within 20 s of tube placement after the first insertion of an endotracheal tube; n=93 for historical period and n=74 for testing period.

  • ETCO2, end-tidal carbon dioxide; n/a, not applicable.