Characteristic | % Felt much better/somewhat better | Adjusted RR | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|
Age (years)† | |||
<47 | 32 | 1 | |
47–55 | 35 | 0.96 | 0.85 to 1.08 |
56–63 | 37 | 1.07 | 0.94 to 1.21 |
>63 | 42 | 1.15 | 1.01 to 1.31 |
Sex | |||
Male | 42 | 1.31 | 1.19 to 1.45 |
Female | 32 | 1 | |
Race | |||
Non-white | 44 | 1.25 | 1.07 to 1.46 |
White | 35 | 1 | |
Education | |||
HS/GED | 44 | 1.39 | 1.21 to 1.60 |
Some college | 41 | 1.33 | 1.19 to 1.50 |
College/postgraduate | 31 | 1 | |
Self-reported health | |||
Fair/poor | 44 | 1.14 | 1.00 to 1.30 |
Good | 36 | 1.01 | 0.93 to 1.11 |
Very good/excellent | 32 | 1 | |
Site | |||
Site 2 | 38 | 1.08 | 0.99 to 1.19 |
Site 3 | 54 | 1.12 | 0.089 to 1.40 |
Site 1 | 34 | 1 | |
Total notes available | |||
1 | 31 | 1 | |
2 | 34 | 1.03 | 0.90 to 1.18 |
3 | 35 | 1.04 | 0.87 to 1.25 |
4 | 39 | 1.17 | 0.96 to 1.43 |
≥5 | 43 | 1.31 | 1.15 to 1.50 |
Notes accurately describe the visit‡ | |||
Always/usually | 36 | 1.86 | 1.21 to 2.85 |
Sometimes/never | 20 | 1 | |
Ease of understanding notes‡ | |||
Very/somewhat easy | 36 | 1.16 | 0.94 to 1.42 |
Very/somewhat difficult | 32 | 1 |
*Multivariable logistic regression model including all the predictors shown in the table, controlled for providers and site.
†Age ranges were defined by quartiles. ‡Derived from postintervention patient survey questions: ‘How often did notes accurately describe the visit?’ and ‘How easy was it to understand your notes?’. Note: Model excluding patients with missing demographic data. RR, risk ratio.