Table 5

Factors positively associated with readmission being assessed as predictable and preventable per interviewed group*

Final modelsPatient
predictable
(n=1240)
Patient
preventable
(n=1067)
Physician
predictable
(n=1216)
Physician
preventable
(n=978)
Nurse
predictable
(n=945)
Nurse
preventable
(n=961)
Carer
predictable
(n=860)
Carer
preventable
(n=816)
Researcher
predictable
(n=1171)
Researcher
preventable
(n=1011)
AUROC final model†0.720.740.710.650.740.700.680.710.710.68
Characteristics OR (95%
CI), p value
OR (95% CI), p value OR (95% CI), p value OR  (95% CI), p value OR  (95% CI), p value OR  (95% CI), p value OR (95% CI), p value OR  (95% CI), p value OR  (95% CI), p value OR  (95% CI), p value
Patient age, year2.34 (1.42 to 4.02),
p<0.001
1.01 (1.00 to 1.02), p=0.0580.98 (0.96 to 0.99), p<0.001
Male sex
Partnered/Married0.67 (0.48 to 0.94), p=0.020.53 (0.38 to 0.75), p<0.0010.58 (0.42 to 0.81), p=0.0010.73 (0.53 to 1.01), p=0.054
IA type‡, non-elective2.34 (1.42 to 4.02),
p<0.001
2.21 (1.44 to 3.38), p<0.0012.03 (1.25 to 3.23), p=0.0041.81 (1.03 to 3.18), p<0.0391.63 (1.06 to 2.51), p=0.0261.95 (1.29 to 2.93), p=0.001
LOS IA‡, day
Length between IA and RA‡, day0.96 (0.94 to 0.98), p<0.0010.96 (0.94 to 0.98), p<0.001
Clinical Frailty Scale33 1.31 (1.20 to 1.43), p<0.0011.38 (0.96 to 1.98), p=0.0871.18 (1.07 to 1.30), p=0.0011.30 (1.19 to 1.42), p<0.001
Charlson Comorbidity Index32 1.07 (1.01 to 1.13), p=0.0290.92 (0.85 to 0.99), p=0.0351.09 (1.03 to 1.16), p=0.0040.92 (0.86 to 1.00), p=0.036
HOSPITAL score171.12 (1.03 to 1.212), p=0.007
Number of medicine at discharge (chronic and non-chronic use)p=0.082p=0.001p=0.094
0–4
5–81.70 (1.06 to 2.72), p=0.0280.74 (0.48 to 1.15), p=0.1781.00 (0.63 to 1.59), p=0.97
More than 81.55 (0.98 to 2.45), p=0.0591.45 (0.96 to 2.19), p=0.751.41 (0.93 to 2.15), p=0.11
Patient’s DNR order at discharge IA‡, do resuscitate1.44 (1.00 to 2.07), p=0.0480.62 (0.42 to 0.92), p=0.018
ICU/CCU/HDU admission during IA‡, yes
Cognitive impairment (official diagnosis), yes2.03 (0.89 to 4.63), p=0.091
Fallen at least once in last half year, yes1.37 (0.95 to 1.95), p=0.089
Total admissions year prior to IA, elective and non-electivep<0.001p=0.002p=0.096p=0.090p<0.001
0
1–51.24 (0.93 to 1.67), p=0.1491.45 (1.03 to 2.04), p=0.0311.39 (0.94 to 2.04), p=0.0960.98 (0.71 to 1.34), p=0.8761.40 (1.04 to 1.88), p=0.026
>52.97 (1.92 to 4.59), p<0.0012.37 (1.44 to 3.88), p=0.0011.79 (1.03 to 3.11), p=0.0391.68 (1.00 to 2.80), p=0.0493.40 (2.17 to 5.34), p<0.001
Discharge letter issued at time RA, yes
Follow-up planned at discharge IA, yes0.62 (0.41 to 0.94), p=0.0260.56 (0.37 to 0.85), p=0.0060.66 (0.43 to 1.01), p=0.0570.42 (0.22 to 0.61), p<0.001
Has patient been seen by a doctor between IA and RA? Yes2.08 (1.47 to 2.93),
p<0.001
Was a summary provided at discharge? Yes0.67 (0.46 to 0.98), p=0.041.38 (0.96 to 1.98), p=0.087
Did you (the patient) suggest doctors to stay longer at IA? Yes2.18 (1.35 to 3.53), p=0.0021.56 (0.99 to 2.46), p=0.056
Did you (the patient) feel better at discharge (IA)? Yes0.68 (0.47 to 0.98),
p=0.039
0.69 (0.48 to 0.98), p=0.0390.62 (0.44 to 0.87), p=0.006
Did you (the patient) feel ready at discharge (IA)? Yes0.29 (0.20 to 0.42),
p<0.001
0.22 (0.15 to 0.32), p<0.0010.71 (0.52 to 0.97), p=0.0330.46 (0.33 to 0.65), p<0.0010.47 (0.33 to 0.68), p<0.0010.42 (0.30 to 0.60), p<0.0010.24 (0.17 to 0.34), p<0.0010.48 (0.36 to 0.65), p<0.0010.46 (0.33 to 0.65), p<0.001
  • *Corrected for country for all

  • †AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curves.

  • ‡IA, index admission; RA, readmission; LOS IA, length of stay index admission; HOSPITAL, prediction score 30-day readmission17; DNR, do not resuscitate; ICU, intensive care unit; CCU, coronary care unit; HDU, high dependency unit.