| Danelder |
Individual learning and skills training Training events ‘done to us’ and not easily applicable in practice Unable to share cross-sectoral learning Concerns about opening a Pandora’s box of organisational concerns
|
Collective member-led learning about practical application of skills Unexpectedly successful large-scale cross-sectoral information sharing ‘Healing’ and ownership through open discussions
|
| Dandem |
Lack of information sharing between sectors Lack of group learning opportunities Top-down training to meet goals
|
Start of cross-sectoral learning about each other’s services Genuine joint planning based on dialogue across former boundaries Still some key players not included
|
| Furncop |
Fear of exposing concerns Didactic provision of evidence for change ‘Business’ meetings to run improvement project Hierarchical provision of clinical guidance (often rejected)
|
Closer team working and interactive information/skills sharing Less hierarchically dominated discussions, including greater attention to ‘patients’ stories’ Open discussion of obstacles and potential ways forward
|
| Furndem |
Didactic skills training Avoidance of key concerns Interprofessional mistrust ‘Silo’ discussions with minimal information sharing between ‘tribes’
|
Cross-sectoral information sharing Open discussion of concerns Interprofessional collaborative planning for change
|