Table 2

Effect of Dashboard on performance and validation indicators: absolute and relative intervention effects with 95% CI at 30 months following introduction of intervention, and corresponding time period for external control indicators, 2009–2015

Clinical performance indicatorAbsolute difference from predicted (%)
(95% CI for %)
Relative difference from predicted (%)
(95% CI for %)
Primary analyses
 Indicator 1—unsatisfactory newborn screening samples0.40 (−2.17 to 2.97)0.17 (−1.85 to 2.20)
 Indicator 2—episiotomy−1.51 (−2.39 to −0.64)*−0.14 (−0.28 to −0.01)*
 Indicator 3—formula supplementation0.30 (−1.01 to 1.08)0.00 (−0.07 to 0.07)
 Indicator 4—elective repeat caesarean delivery prior to 39 weeks−10.38 (−11.51 to −9.25)*−0.23 (−0.28 to −0.19)*
 Indicator 5—GBS screening2.84 (2.17 to 3.51)*0.03 (0.02 to 0.04)*
 Indicator 6—postdates induction prior to 41 weeks−11.69 (−15.96 to −7.42)*−0.42 (−0.69 to −0.15)*
Control analyses
 Internal control outcome 1—caesarean in induced nulliparous women−0.17 (−1.83 to 1.49)−0.01 (−0.09 to 0.08)
 Internal control outcome 2—use of auscultation for fetal surveillance−2.92 (−8.43 to 2.59)−0.05 (−0.26 to 0.16)
 External control indicators (British Columbia data set)
 Indicator 2—episiotomy0.78 (0.18 to 1.37)*0.18 (−0.11 to 0.48)
 Indicator 4—elective repeat caesarean delivery prior to 39 weeks2.19 (−11.30 to 6.92)−0.06 (−0.41 to 0.29)
 Indicator 5—GBS screening0.24 (−0.52 to 1.00)0.00 (−0.01 to 0.02)
 Indicator 6—postdates induction prior to 41 weeks3.22 (2.49 to 3.96)*0.27 (0.13 to 0.42)*
  • *P<0.05.

  • GBS, group B streptococcus.