Table 2

Measures of PICC appropriateness before versus after implementation of MAGIC

	Intervention site (n, %)			Control sites (n, %)			Interaction P*
	Preimplementation	Postimplementation	P*	Preimplementation	Postimplementation	P*	Interaction P*
Appropriateness Before versus After Implementation of MAGIC
MAGIC appropriateness measure
PICC placement ≤5 days	127 (24.6)	60 (13.5)	<0.001	759 (21.5)	703 (22.8)	<0.001	0.031
Multilumen PICC use	462 (89.5)	277 (62.1)	<0.001	2366 (67.3)	1955 (63.5)	<0.001	<0.001
ICU PICC placement ≤14 days	167 (32.3)	83 (18.6)	0.003	678 (19.2)	600 (19.5)	0.004	<0.001
Complications Before versus After Implementation of MAGIC
PICC - Compilation
Catheter occlusion	147 (28.4)	98 (22.0)	0.011	546 (15.5)	449 (14.6)	0.625	0.056
CLABSI	10 (1.9)	14 (3.1)	0.424	156 (4.4)	126 (4.0)	0.977	0.558
VTE	26 (5.0)	18 (4.0)	0.868	175 (5.0)	125 (4.1)	0.878	0.798
Any complication	175 (33.9)	119 (26.7)	0.015	790 (22.4)	640 (20.8)	0.759	0.036

*Adjusted for patient age, gender, race, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index and length of stay.
ICU, intensive care unit; MAGIC, Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters; PICC, peripherally inserted central catheter; CLABSI, central line-associated bloodstream infection; MAGIC, Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters; PICC, peripherally inserted central catheter; VTE, venous thromboembolism.