Table 1

Characteristics of 24 included studies

Author (year)CountryWard admitted, study settingStudy periodPopulationMean age, % maleDefinition of medication (non)-adherenceMethod of detectionHA rate due to NA (%)Type of non-adherence (%)HA rate due to NA
among patients with
MRP
Medication classes involved (%)Quality assessment
McKenney and Harrison (1976)19 USAGeneral medical ward, teaching hospital2 monthsGeneral population56.1% of population aged 50 years or overPatients admit to taking less than the prescribed number of doses of a given medication during the month prior to hospital admission.Interview and medical record review23/216 (10.65)NR23/59 (38.98)CVS drugs (39.1), endocrine drugs (26.1), CNS drugs (21.7), respiratory drugs (8.7), infections (4.3)Moderate risk of bias
Stewart et al (1980)20 USAInpatient psychiatric unit6 monthsGeneral population33.9 years, 40% maleHospital admission was related to patients not following directions for prescribed medications.Interview, medical record review and drug level analysis5/60 (8.33)NR5/25 (20.00)CNS drugs (80), endocrine drugs (20)Moderate risk of bias
Bergman and Wiholm (1981)21 SwedenMedical ward, university hospital3.5 monthsGeneral population59±19 years (range 16–97 years), 49.5% maleHaynes definition42 as the extent to which the patient behaviour coincided with clinical prescription.Interview, medical record review and drug level analysis21/285 (7.37)UD (11/21), OD (10/21)21/45 (46.67)NRLow risk of bias
Yosselson-Superstine and Weiss (1982)22 IsraelPaediatric ward, university hospital7 monthsChildren (0–16 years)NRNRInterview and medical record review31/906 (3.42)Discontinued medication (10/31), UD (11/31), OD (6/31), mixed type (4/31)31/160 (19.38)Infection drugs (64.5), CNS drugs (22.6), CVS drugs (3.2)Moderate risk of bias
Bigby et al (1987)23 USAEmergency admissions, teaching hospital12 monthsGeneral population60.7±18.8 years, 36% malePatient ability to comply with prescribed therapies.Interview of patients and primary care clinicians26/686 (3.79)NR26/73 (35.62)NRLow risk of bias
Davidsen et al (1988)24 DenmarkDepartment of Cardiology, university hospital2 monthsGeneral populationNon-adhering patients (F: 74.9±9.7 years,
M: 73.3±5.7 years), 50% male
A deviation of more than 50% between the dose actually taken and the prescribed drug dose.Interview and medical record review16/426 (3.76)NR16/65 (24.62)CVS drugs (56.3), respiratory drugs (6.3), other drugs (37.5)Low risk of bias
Grymonpre et al (1988)25 CanadaDepartment of Medicine, tertiary hospital4 monthsElderly
(≥50 years)
69.8±0.5 years, 57.4% maleA failure to accomplish the goals of treatment because of deliberate non-adherence to a therapeutic programme.Interview, medical record review and pill count26/863 (3.01)NR26/162 (16.05)NRLow risk of bias
Col et al (1990)2 USAMedical ward, community teaching hospital3 monthsElderly
(≥65 years)
76.6 years (range 65–99 years), 45.4% maleAny non-trivial deviation from the prescribed medication regimen.Interview and medical record review34/315 (10.79)UD (81%), OD (17%), misuse (2%),
intentional (54%), unintentional (46%)
34/89 (38.20)CVS drugs (63.9), respiratory drugs (30.5), endocrine drugs (5.6)Low risk of bias
Stanton et al (1994)26 AustraliaMedical ward, teaching hospital10 weeksGeneral populationMedian age 67 years (range 11–97 years), 50.8% maleDeviation from prescribed medication regimen due to non-comprehension, forgetfulness or by choice, producing an exacerbation of symptoms of the patient’s condition.Interview and medical record review10/691 (1.45)NR10/68 (14.71)Respiratory drugs (60), CVS drugs (40)Low risk of bias
Courtman and Stallings (1995)27 CanadaMedical ward, tertiary teaching hospital139 daysElderly
(≥65 years)
78 years (range 65–108 years), 41.3% maleNRMedical record review and drug level analysis9/150 (6.00)NR9/46 (19.57)NRLow risk of bias
Dartnell et al (1996)28 AustraliaRoyal Melbourne Hospital, teaching hospital1 monthGeneral populationAged 15–91 yearsPatient or carer described drug taking that deviated from prescribed directions; or the patient’s mental condition or home situation together with the presenting condition made non-compliance highly likely; or drug-assay determinations concurred with a doctor’s suspicion of non-compliance.Interview and medical record review15/965 (1.55)UD (12/15), OD (3/15)15/55 (27.27)CVS drugs (53.3), respiratory drugs (33.3), endocrine (6.7), CNS drugs (6.7)Low risk of bias
Nelson and Talbert (1996)29 USAIntensive care unit or internal medicine service, university hospital1 monthGeneral populationMedian age in drug-related admission=43 years, 60% maleNRMedical record review and drug level analysis48/450 (10.76)NR48/73 (65.75)NRLow risk of bias
Murad and Chawla (1997)30 BahrainMedical ward, medical centre1 monthGeneral populationNRNRMedical record review206/2167 (9.51)NR206/523 (39.39)NRModerate risk of bias
Chan et al (2001)31 AustraliaMedical ward, public acute care hospital2 monthsElderly
(≥75 years)
81.8 years (range 75–94 years), 45% maleA deviation from a prescribed medication regimen due to non-comprehension, forgetfulness or by choice, producing exacerbation of symptoms of the patient’s condition.Interview and medical record review9/240 (3.75)NR9/73 (12.33)NRLow risk of bias
Malhotra et al (2001)32 IndiaMedical emergency department, tertiary hospital7 monthsElderly
(≥65 years)
72.5±4.7 years (range 65–91 years), 47.1% maleHaynes definition42 as the extent to which the patient’s behaviour coincides with the clinical prescription.Interview and medical record review44/578 (7.61)UD (71% of all non-compliance), OD (17%), misuse (2%), intentional (63%), unintentional (37%)44/83 (53.01)CVS drugs (61.4), respiratory drugs (18.2), endocrine drugs (11.4), CNS drugs (9.1)Low risk of bias
Martin et al (2002)33 SpainAdmissions through the emergency department9 monthsGeneral population68.4 years, 58.9% malePatients did not comply with the prescribed regimen.Interview and medical record review91/1661 (5.48)NR91/215 (42.33)CVS drugs (48.4), respiratory drugs (24.2), GI drugs (15.4), CNS drugs (4.4), endocrine drugs (3.3), infection drugs (2.2), UTI (1.1), nutrition and blood (1.1)Low risk of bias
Otero López et al (2006)34 SpainMedical units, university hospital6 monthsGeneral populationNRNRInterview and medical record review19/2643 (0.72)NR42/177 (23.73)Respiratory, CVS, CNS, endocrine drugsLow risk of bias
Samoy et al (2006)35 CanadaInternal medicine, teaching hospital12 weeksGeneral population69.3±18.8 years, 49.4% maleAny noxious, unintended or undesired effect caused by failure to receive a drug.Interview and medical record review22/565 (3.89)NR22/136 (16.18)NRLow risk of bias
Kongkaew (2009)36 UKTwo tertiary hospitals18 monthsGeneral populationOD group=38.49±16.75 years,
44% male UD group=58±20.8 years,
57.1% male
Haynes definition42 as the extent to which the patient’s behaviour (in terms of taking medication, following diets or executing other lifestyle changes) coincides with the clinical prescription.Interview and medical record review190/3904 (4.87)OD (148/190), UD (42/190)190/604 (31.46)OD: analgesic, CNS drugs
UD: CNS drugs, endocrine
Low risk of bias
Singh et al (2011)37 IndiaInternal medicine, tertiary hospital6 monthsGeneral population49.8±18.2 years, 60% maleDRP classifications by Hepler and Strand.43 Interview and medical record review55/3560 (1.54)NR55/118 (46.61)NRLow risk of bias
Al-Arifi et al (2014)38 Saudi ArabiaAdmission via emergency department, tertiary hospital1 monthGeneral populationMedian age 51 years, 53.33% maleHaynes definition42 as the extent to which the patient’s drug-taking behaviour (in terms of taking medication) coincides with the prescription.Interview, medical record review and drug level analysis17/251 (6.77)NR17/52 (32.69)NRModerate risk of bias
Kongkaew (2015)39 ThailandInpatient units of university hospital, general hospital and community hospitals16 monthsGeneral population56.7±17.4 years, 50.1% maleWHO definition1 as the extent to which a person’s behaviour—taking medication, following a diet and/or executing lifestyle changes—corresponds with agreed recommendations from a healthcare provider.Interview and medical record review32/3755 (0.85)OD (11/32), UD (21/32)32/91 (35.16)NRLow risk of bias
Gustafsson et al (2016)40 SwedenAcute internal medicine ward and the orthopaedic ward at university hospital, and county hospital3 yearsElderly
(≥65 years)
Among drug-related group: mean age 82.4 years, 39.7% maleA deviation from the prescribed medications because of a choice, non-comprehension or forgetfulness, leading to an ADR or exacerbation of symptoms.Medical record review19/458 (4.15)NR20/189 (10.58)Endocrine, CVS, respiratory, CNS, injectionLow risk of bias
Jolivot et al (2016)41 FranceMedical ICU, teaching hospital12 monthsGeneral populationMedian age 65 years, 57.5% maleNRInterview and medical record review31/701 (4.42)NR31/173 (17.92)NRLow risk of bias
  • CNS, central nervous system; CVS, cardiovascular system; DRP, drug-related problem; GI, gastrointestinal; HA, hospital admission; ICU, intensive care unit; MRP, medication-related problem; NA, non-adherence; NR, not reported; OD, overdosage; UD, underdosage; UTI, urinary tract infection.