Table 2

Comparative (decision aid vs usual care) continuous outcomes

StudyScaleMean (SD) intervention*Mean (SD) control*Mean difference (95% CI)P values
Clinicians’ satisfaction with decision aid and decision making process
 Montori e t al 27 2017, OsteoporosisScale 1–74.5 (range 3–5)4 (range 2–5)0.52 (0.27 to 0.78)<0.01
 Légaré et al 30 2012,
Antibiotics for respiratory infections (2)
Scale 0–108.2 (1.3)8.4 (1.0)−0.2 (−0.6 to 0.2)
 Légaré et al 31 2011,
Antibiotics for respiratory infections (1)
Scale 1–108.7 (1.2)8.5 (1.3)0.2 (−0.34 to 0.89)0.29
 Leighl et al 34 2011, Palliative chemotherapy in colorectal cancerScale 6–30Median 24 (range 18–30)Median 24 (range 21–30)0
 Ozanne et al 35 2007, Breast cancer preventionScale 1–51.82 (0.52)1.78 (0.45)0.040.82
 Whelan et al 36 2003,
Adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
Scale 1–54.37 (95% CI 4.16 to 4.58)4.35 (95% CI 4.19 to 4.51)0.020.89
Decisional conflict
 Warner et al 20 2015, Smoking cessationDecisional comfort scale (0: conflict, 100: comfort)81 (±12)74 (±16)70.034
 LeBlanc et al 26 2015, OsteoporosisDecisional Conflict Scale (DCS), scores: 0–100 (0: no conflict, 100: highest conflict)Median 25 (IQR 6−25)Median 25 (IQR 14−25)00.18
 LeBlanc et al 28 2015, DepressionDecisional Conflict Scale (DCS), scores: 0–100 (0: conflict, 100: comfort)79.7 (95% CI 77.6 to 81.8)68.3 (95% CI 65.4 to 71.2)11.4 (5.7 to 17.1)<0.001
Helpfulness of the shared information
 Montori et al 27 2011, OsteoporosisScale 1–75.8 (range 3−7)5.2 (range 2−7)0.64 (0.18 to 1.09)0.006
Intention to use decision aid/SDM making in the future/for other decisions
 Montori et al 27 2011, OsteoporosisScale 1–76.1 (range 4−7)4.9 (range 1−7)1.2 (0.73 to 1.67)<0.001
 Légaré et al 30 2012, Antibiotics for respiratory infections (2)3-item scale (scores: −3 to 3)1.7 (0.9)1.8 (0.7)0.0 (−0.3 to 0.2)
 Légaré et al 31 2011, Antibiotics for respiratory infections(1)3-item scale (scores: −3 to 3)1.3 (1.2)0.8 (1.3)0.5 (−0.2 to 1.3)0.77
Would recommend decision aid/SDM to other clinicians
 Montori et al 27 2011, OsteoporosisScale 1–75.9 (range 3−7)4.8 (range 1−7)1.09 (0.57 to 1.61)<0.001
Intention to follow clinical practice guidelines
 Légaré et al 30 2012, Antibiotics for respiratory infections (2)3-item scale (scores: −3 to 3)2.0 (0.7)2.2 (0.7)−0.2 (−0.5 to 0.1)
 Légaré et al 31 2011, Antibiotics for respiratory infections (1)3-item scale (scores: −3 to 3)2.1 (0.9)2.2 (0.5)−0.1 (−0.7 to 0.5)
Length of the consultation in outpatient setting
 Coylewright et al 13 Stable 2016, coronary artery diseaseminutes‘The mean duration of the clinical visits was 24 min, ranging from
5 to 60 min.’
‘Both decision aid and UC visits took a similar amount of time…’
 Perestelo-Pérez e t al 17 2016, Statinminutes18.10 (8.07)19.65 (12.61)−4.36 (−12.9 to 4.18) Beta/OR from multilevel linear/logistic regression
 Nannenga et al 18 2009, StatinminutesOnly mean difference available3.8 (−2.9 to 10.5)
 Thomson et al 19 2007, Anticoagulation atrial fibrillationminutesMedian 31 (IQR 16−41)Median 21 (IQR 19−26)100.001
 Mathers et al 212012, Insulinminutes15.31 (2−39)16.95 (5 to 45)−1.67 (−0.93 to -4.27)
 LeBlanc et al 26 2015, OsteoporosisminutesMedian 11.5 (range 5.4 to 21.4)Median 10.7 (range 2.5 to 54.9)0.8 (−33.6 to 3.0)
 Montori et al 27 2015, Osteoporosisminutesmedian 12.4 (range 2.3 to 27.4)median 9.4 (range 2.1 to 58)3.00.045
 LeBlanc et al 28 2015, Depressionminutes44 (22)48 (27)-40.47
 Loh et al 29 2007, Depressionminutes31.4 (15.1)29.2 (10.7)2.20.476
 Walczak et al 332017, Cancer advance care planningminutes20.620.40.20.307
 Ozanne et al 35 2007, Breast cancer preventionminutes24.3 (7.5)21.9 (8.51)2.40.42
 Whelan et al 36 2003, Adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancerminutes47.539.90.26
 Bekker et al 37 2004, Prenatal diagnosisminutes32.2 (95% CI 28.6 to 35.8)26.3 (95% CI 23.2 to 29.2)5.90.01
Length of conversation in emergency department
 Hess et al 15 2016, Chest painminutes4.4 (0.40)3.1 (0.29)1.30.008
  • *Unless specified otherwise.

  • SDM, shared decision making.