Table 2

Characteristics of hospitals in each quadrant

Quadrant 1
P+/E+*
N=7		Quadrant 2
P+/E-†
N=2		Quadrant 3
P−/E+‡
N=3		Quadrant 4
P−/E−§
N=2
Level of care—n (%)¶
 Low-risk2 (29)2 (100)0 (0)0 (0)
 High-risk5 (71)0 (0)3 (100)2 (100)
Birth volume/year—n (%)
 <5002 (29)2 (100)0 (0)0 (0)
 501–24993 (43)0 (0)1 (33)1 (50)
 >25002 (29)0 (0)2 (67)1 (50)
Method of data entry into provincial registry—n (%)
 Manual5 (71)1 (50)2 (67)1 (50)
 Upload from EHR2 (29)1 (50)1 (33)1 (50)
Of the KPIs that were red/yellow in April 2013, percent that changed to green by March 2016—mean (SD)
(range)		72 (36.7)
­
(0–100)**		63 (4.7)
­
(60–67)		26 (6.6)
­
(20–33)		0 (0)
­
(0)
Number of KPIs green in March 2016 (out of 6)—mean (SD)
(range)		5 (0.8)
(4–6)		4.5 (0.7)
(4–5)		2.3 (0.6)
(2–3)		2 (1.4)
(1–3)

  • *Quadrant 1: High performance, high engagement.

  • †Quadrant 2: High performance, low engagement.

  • ‡Quadrant 3: Low performance, high engagement.

  • §Quadrant 4: Low performance, low engagement.

  • ¶Low-risk includes level I hospitals; high-risk includes level II and III hospitals; level of care defined as per the Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health.37

  • **Including one site who was green on all six KPIs at baseline.

  • E, engagement with Dashboard; EHR, electronic health record; KPI, key performance indicator; P, performance on KPIs.