Table 2

Effects of the ACP-MOST video on primary and secondary outcomes

Instrument: measureAll units*Medical unitSurgical unit
Usual care (n=108)Video intervention (n=142)P valueUsual care (n=15)Video intervention (n=39)P valueUsual care (n=76)Video intervention (n=94)P value
Primary outcome
 Patient ACP Knowledge Quiz: median % score (IQR)70 (40, 90)100 (90, 100) < 0.0001 70 (30, 90)90 (80, 100) 0.003 60 (50, 90)100 (90, 100) < 0.0001
Secondary outcomes
 MOST completed <48 hours of admission: n (%)87 (81)130 (92) 0.01 14 (93)34 (87)160 (79)87 (93) 0.01
 MOST concordance, n (%)75 (69)127 (89) < 0.0001 11 (73)35 (90)0.151 (67)84 (89) 0.0003
 CANHELP: overall satisfaction, median (IQR)4.3 (4.0, 4.7)4.4 (4.1, 4.7)0.24.2 (3.8, 4.7)4.3 (4.0, 4.5)14.2 (4.0, 4.6)4.5 (4.1, 4.7) 0.01
 CANHELP: decision- making, median (IQR)4.3 (3.8, 4.8)4.5 (4.3, 4.8) 0.001 4.3 (3.8, 4.5)4.5 (4.0, 4.8)0.74.3 (3.8, 4.5)4.5 (4.3, 4.8) < 0.0001
 SURE Test score (4/4), n (%)78 (72)132 (93) < 0.0001 10 (67)37 (95) 0.008 57 (75)86 (92) 0.008
  • The primary outcome was patients’ understanding of key ACP concepts. Secondary outcomes were ACP documentation completed within 48 hours of hospital admission, concordance between patients’ expressed and chart-documented wishes for care, patients’ satisfaction with decision-making and patients’ decisional confidence.

  • *Values in bold indicate significant differences at p<0.05.

  • *Includes medical, surgical, telemetry and intensive care unit (ICU). Telemetry and ICU-specific results are not shown due to small sample size. Telemetry usual care n=9, video intervention n=7, no outcomes significant at p<0.05. ICU usual care n=8, video intervention n=2, no outcomes significant at p<0.05.

  • ACP, advance care planning; CANHELP, Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project; MOST, Medical Order for Scope of Treatment; SURE, Sure of myself, Understand information, Risk/benefit ratio and Encouragement.