Table 1

Prevalence rate of Apgar score<75mins during the study period*

PeriodControlIntervention 1Intervention 2Intervention 3Follow-up 1Follow-up 2
Overall
 Apgar<75 (n)189215208224227228
 Births (n)14 34215 42513 90514 66413 85714 321
 Prevalence, 95% CI1.32 (1.14 to 1.52)1.39 (1.22 to 1.59)1.50 (1.31 to 1.71)1.53 (1.34 to 1.74)1.64 (1.44 to 1.86)1.59 (1.40 to 1.81)
Intention-to-treat: Intervention as per randomisation
 Unexposed
 Apgar<75mins (n)18914752
 Births (n)14 34210 6194540
 Prevalence, 95% CI1.32 (1.14 to 1.52)1.38 (1.12 to 1.62)1.14 (0.87 to 1.50)
 Exposed
 Apgar<75mins (n)68156224227228
 Births (n)4806936514 66413 85714 321
 Prevalence, 95% CI1.41 (1.11 to 1.79)1.67 (1.42 to 1.95)1.53 (1.34 to 1.74)1.64 (1.44 to 1.86)1.59 (1.40 to 1.81)
As-implemented : Intervention as per first training
 Unexposed
 Apgar<75mins (n)189184124875121
 Births (n)14 34214 2939 0406 6412 8391 306
 Prevalence, 95% CI1.32 (1.14 to 1.52)1.29 (1.11 to 1.49)1.37 (1.15 to 1.63)1.31 (1.06 to 1.61)1.80 (1.37 to 2.36)1.61 (1.05 to 2.45)
Exposed
 Apgar<75mins (n)3184137176207
 Births (n)1 1324 8658 02311 01813 015
 Prevalence, 95% CI2.74 (1.93 to 3.87)1.73 (1.40 to 2.13)1.71 (1.45 to 2.01)1.60 (1.38 to 1.85)1.59 (1.38 to 1.82)
  • *Based on the 86 514 births with an assigned Apgar score observed in the 12 maternity units which had attended the THISTLE Study Train the Trainer (T3) programme and had not implemented the intervention prior to the study (two units declined to participate during the study period).