Table 3

Correlation between unadjusted and adjusted physician-level estimates of resource use and clinical outcomes in GIM

HospitalLength of stay
(Corr, p value)
Readmission (Corr, p value)Mortality
(Corr, p value)
Imaging
(Corr, p value)
All hospitals0.96 (<0.001)0.96 (<0.001)0.81 (<0.001)0.96 (<0.001)
A0.94 (<0.001)0.98 (<0.001)0.75 (<0.001)0.99 (<0.001)
B0.94 (<0.001)0.91 (<0.001)0.86 (<0.001)0.89 (<0.001)
C0.87 (<0.001)0.96 (<0.001)0.92 (<0.001)0.92 (<0.001)
D0.98 (<0.001)0.90 (<0.001)0.76 (0.001)0.96 (<0.001)
E0.96 (<0.001)0.93 (<0.001)0.81 (<0.001)0.95 (<0.001)
F0.98 (<0.001)0.97 (<0.001)0.77 (<0.001)0.97 (<0.001)
G0.98 (<0.001)0.94 (<0.001)0.84 (<0.001)0.98 (<0.001)
  • The correlation was calculated between unadjusted and adjusted estimates of each measure. The following patient baseline covariates were used in adjustment: age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, day of admission, time of admission, Clinical Classifications Software (CCS) classification of discharge diagnosis, hospitalisation within 30 previous days, Laboratory-based Acute Physiology Score and study year. To examine the correlation across all hospitals as a single measure, all physicians were included and we adjusted for hospital fixed effects.

  • Corr, correlation coefficient; GIM, general internal medicine.