General mechanisms | Factors that supported the overall success of the QI curriculum. |
Structured curricula with clear expectations (eg, minimum number of Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and project completion by end of residency) and deliverables (eg, submission of a project charter and final reports). Protected time for both learning QI (ie, integrating QI teaching into the core curriculum) and to work on QI projects. Mentors: QI-trained faculty, chief resident of quality and safety, resident champion, or senior resident. QI curriculum leadership (faculty or chief resident of quality and safety). Academic (eg, continuing education credits) or financial incentives for faculty leaders, mentors, and learners.
|
Learning mechanisms | Factors that supported QI learning and project progression as learners could apply their growing knowledge and skills to their projects. |
|
Project mechanisms | Factors that specifically supported QI project progression, sustainability and impact. |
Project screening tools (eg, scoring frameworks and reviewing project charters) to ensure projects are appropriate in scope and alignment with the local health system priorities. Frequent meetings (eg, an hour per month during protected academic time) to maintain project momentum. Access to data (eg, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data) and help analysing data. Project handover mechanisms (eg, project handover tools) to promote continuity and sustainability for short-term projects. Working in teams on QI projects, with other members of the health team, other medical learners, and other health professions trainees. Incentives or recognition for top-performing groups or projects.
|