Top six priorities for improvement at the consultation, care structure and health system levels and the complexity for their implementation
Areas of improvement | Complexity to implement actions for improvement Median (IQR) |
Priorities at consultation level | |
To improve pain management | 3.5 (3–4.8) |
To improve care professionals’ attitude so as not to look down on patients | 3.5 (3–5.5) |
To improve patients’ journey during the diagnosis of chronic conditions | 5 (4–6.2) |
To avoid tunnel visioning on one condition and neglecting other medical problems or symptoms | 4.5 (3.8–6.2) |
To care for patients holistically, and not for his/her organs | 4.5 (3–6.2) |
To better involve patients in care decisions | 3.5 (3–5.5) |
Priorities at care structure level | |
To develop the access to specific emergency care for chronic patients | 5 (3–7) |
To systematically provide patients copies of medical reports and results | 3 (1.5–4.5) |
To reduce the delay to obtain appointments | 4 (3–6) |
To reorganise care structures for multidisciplinary care | 4 (3–5) |
To organise group visits and tests on same days if possible | 6 (4–7) |
To improve the coordination between care professionals | 3 (2–5) |
Priorities at healthcare system level | |
To transform care professionals' training to improve their knowledge in specific conditions/treatments | 7 (4.2–8) |
To create a repertoire of care professionals identifying their skills in specific diseases or treatments | 6.5 (5–8) |
To prevent doctors exceeding the fees reimbursed by the national health insurance system | 4 (3.2–5.8) |
To transform care professionals' training to improve their interpersonal skills | 5 (3–7) |
To provide patients ‘official’ documents to prove that they are ill | 4 (3–5.8) |
To reduce the amount of advances of certain expenses | 4 (2.2–5.8) |
Complexity was assessed by care professionals, hospital managers and health policy decision makers with ratings ranging from 1 (extremely easy to implement actions) to 10 (extremely difficult to implement actions).
Priorities were identified from the results of a logit model of patients’ ranking data.