Table 2

Characteristics of community hospitals that participated in sustainability monitoring

All eligible community hospitals
(n=34)
Participated in sustainability monitoring
(n=23)
Dropped out of sustainability monitoring
(n=11)
P value*
Teaching hospital (n, %)30 (88)19 (83)11 (100)0.28
Hospital size (n, %)0.86
 Small (<100)2 (6)2 (9)0 (0)
 Medium (100–249)9 (26)6 (26)3 (27)
 Large (≥250)23 (68)15 (65)8 (73)
Geographic region (n, %)0.27
 West12 (35)9 (39)3 (27)
 South7 (21)3 (13)4 (36)
 Northeast7 (21)4 (17)3 (27)
 Midwest8 (24)7 (30)1 (9)
Location (n, %)0.75
 Urban14 (41)9 (39)5 (45)
 Suburban18 (53)12 (52)6 (55)
 Rural2 (6)2 (9)0 (0)
Ownership model (n, %)0.55
 Government2 (6)1 (4)1 (10)
 Private, non-profit32 (94)22 (96)10 (85)
 Private, investor owned0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Core intervention components implemented (of five total) (mean, SD)4.4 (1.0)4.6 (0.8)4.1 (1.4)0.50
Electronic health record integration (n, %)17 (50)13 (57)4 (36)0.46
Percent improvement in guideline adherence during collaborative (mean % change, SD)†23 (17)29 (14)15 (17) 0.02
  • Bold font signifies statistically significant values.

  • *Calculated using multivariable regression models that adjusted for all listed patient characteristics.

  • †Mean change in rate of adherence across all three guideline adherence measures during the collaborative.