Table 1

Results from mixed-effects linear regression models: time trends in the effectiveness of five strategies*

AnalysisNo of studiesNo of effect sizesLatest month of follow-upCoefficientP value95% CI
(A) Training alone
ITS studies only22911NANANANA
i. ITS+non-ITS studies with >2 follow-up measurements1719230−0.190.023−0.36−0.03
Sensitivity analyses
ii. ITS+non-ITS studies with
>2 follow-up measurements from >3 studies†
1617710.5−0.230.228−0.590.14
iii. ITS+all non-ITS studies6554930−0.350.001−0.56−0.14
(B) Supervision alone
i. ITS studies only339330.88<0.00010.721.03
ii. ITS+non-ITS studies with >2 follow-up measurements547330.86<0.00010.671.04
Sensitivity analyses
iii. ITS+non-ITS studies with >2 follow-up measurements from >3 studies†5336−0.540.652−2.891.81
iv. ITS+all non-ITS studies1690330.82<0.00010.581.05
(C) Training plus supervision
ITS studies only00NANANANANA
i. ITS+non-ITS studies with >2 follow-up measurements59016−0.400.005−0.68−0.12
Sensitivity analyses
ii. ITS+non-ITS studies with >2 follow-up measurements from >3 studies†5826−0.520.211−1.350.30
iii. ITS+all non-ITS studies2215616−0.460.200−1.170.25
(D) Group problem-solving alone
i. ITS studies only8230340.50<0.00010.370.64
ii. ITS+non-ITS studies with >2
follow-up measurements
8230340.50<0.00010.370.64
Sensitivity analyses
iii. ITS+non-ITS studies with >2 follow-up measurements from >3 studies†8225300.53<0.00010.390.67
iv. ITS+all non-ITS studies12245‡340.46<0.00010.310.61
(E) Group problem-solving plus training
i. ITS studies only419924−0.130.485−0.510.24
ii. ITS+non-ITS studies with >2
follow-up measurements
419924−0.130.485−0.510.24
Sensitivity analyses
iii. ITS+non-ITS studies with >2 follow-up measurements from >3 studies†411612.5−0.450.259−1.230.33
iv. ITS+all non-ITS studies419924−0.130.485−0.510.24
  • Roman numerals number each regression analysis performed and are referred to in the STATA code and diagnostic plots on GitHub.

  • Coefficient is the model coefficient, which is the mean percentage-point change in healthcare provider practice outcomes per month.

  • *Estimates from random-intercept linear regression models adjusted for healthcare provider baseline performance.

  • †The sensitivity analysis used the ‘ITS+non-ITS studies with >2 follow-up measurements’ dataset, but only included effect sizes up through the latest follow-up time that involved three or more studies.

  • ‡One effect size was missing baseline performance and was excluded from the regression modelling.

  • ITS, interrupted time series; NA, not available.