Table 3

Results of logistic regression model for patient and system factors for patients with any adverse event and for patients with preventable adverse events (n=5802)*

Patient and system factorsUnadjusted OR
(95% CI)
Adjusted OR
(95% CI)
P value for adjusted OR
Any adverse event
Age (years)1.04 (1.01 to 1.07)1.04 (1.01 to 1.07)0.010
Sex (female vs male)0.91 (0.66 to 1.26)0.92 (0.67 to 1.28)0.624
English or French not spoken in the home by either parent (yes vs no)0.82 (0.45 to 1.53)0.98 (0.54 to 1.78)0.945
Both parents immigrated in the last 5 years (yes vs no)0.84 (0.40 to 1.76)0.96 (0.48 to 1.93)0.906
Triage acuity†0.044
 High acuity (resuscitation/emergent) versus low acuity (semiurgent/non-urgent)1.66 (1.10 to 2.51)1.18 (0.75 to 1.86)
 Mid-acuity (urgent) versus low acuity (semiurgent/non-urgent)0.92 (0.66 to 1.28)0.76 (0.53 to 1.08)
Disposition (admitted vs discharged)1.64 (0.98 to 2.74)0.90 (0.45 to 1.82)0.777
Mental health visit (yes vs no)0.32 (0.04 to 2.37)0.16 (0.02 to 1.28)0.084
Chronic condition (yes vs no)1.59 (1.14 to 2.23)1.34 (0.97 to 1.86)0.076
Time to assess patient (hours)1.01 (0.93 to 1.10)1.06 (0.99 to 1.13)0.088
Number of emergency department (ED) physicians involved (≥2 vs 1)1.61 (0.97 to 2.65)1.22 (0.72 to 2.06)0.462
Location in ED (acute care vs ambulatory zone)2.09 (1.45 to 3.01)2.01 (1.36 to 2.98)0.001
Level of physicians initially managing (trainee vs staff)1.08 (0.79 to 1.49)1.02 (0.74 to 1.39)0.924
After-hours visit (yes vs no)0.95 (0.71 to 1.27)0.90 (0.68 to 1.19)0.463
Weekday visit versus weekend visit0.99 (0.69 to 1.41)0.99 (0.70 to 1.39)0.942
Needed a consultation (yes vs no)1.95 (1.20 to 3.17)1.61 (0.87 to 3.00)0.132
Preventable adverse event
Age (years)1.06 (1.03 to 1.09)1.06 (1.02 to 1.09)<0.001
Sex (female vs male)0.80 (0.54 to 1.17)0.79 (0.53 to 1.17)0.231
English or French is not spoken in the home by either parent (yes vs no)0.43 (0.18 to 1.05)0.53 (0.21 to 1.32)0.171
Both parents immigrated in the last 5 years (yes vs no)0.73 (0.32 to 1.67)0.96 (0.42 to 2.21)0.926
Triage acuity0.519
 High acuity (resuscitation/emergent) versus low acuity (semiurgent/non-urgent)1.57 (0.97 to 2.54)1.18 (0.71 to 1.98)
 Mid-acuity (urgent) versus low acuity (semiurgent/non-urgent)1.10 (0.75 to 1.61)0.92 (0.61 to 1.38)
Disposition (admitted vs discharged)1.03 (0.73 to 1.45)0.87 (0.39 to 1.96)0.738
Mental health visit (yes vs no)0.43 (0.06 to 3.15)0.19 (0.02 to 1.51)0.115
Chronic condition (yes vs no)1.90 (1.32 to 2.73)1.55 (1.08 to 2.23)0.016
Time to assess patient (hours)1.05 (0.97 to 1.13)1.09 (1.02 to 1.16)0.010
Number of ED physicians involved (≥2 vs 1)1.08 (0.56 to 2.06)0.79 (0.41 to 1.55)0.501
Location in ED (acute care area vs ambulatory zone)1.93 (1.32 to 2.82)1.85 (1.22 to 2.81)0.004
Level of physicians initially managing (trainee vs staff)1.08 (0.79 to 1.49)0.95 (0.67 to 1.34)0.764
After-hours visit (yes vs no)0.87 (0.62 to 1.23)0.84 (0.60 to 1.18)0.319
Weekday versus weekend visit0.93 (0.62 to 1.42)0.90 (0.61 to 1.34)0.618
Needed a consultation (yes vs no)1.96 (1.17 to 3.31)1.72 (0.87 to 3.42)0.121
  • *The analysis includes patients seen first by ED-specific services. It does not include patients who registered and left without being seen and those referred directly to a consulting service who registered and left without being seen and those referred directly to a consulting service.

  • †Measured using the Pediatric Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (pedCTAS).