Skip to main content
Log in

Initiation of warfarin therapy

Comparison of physician dosing with computer-assisted dosing

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a prospective, randomized study at two university hospitals, the authors examined how effectively housestaff physicians (n=36) managed the initiation of warfarin therapy compared with a computer-assisted dosing regimen (n=39) using the software program Warfcalc, which was managed by one of the authors. Target prothrombin time ratios were selected by the physicians. Study endpoints included: the time to reach a therapeutic prothrombin ratio, the time to reach a stable therapeutic dose, the number of patients transiently overanticoagulated, the number of bleeding complications, and the accuracy of the predicted maintenance dose, which was assessed at steady-state 10–14 days later. Computer-assisted dosing consistently outperformed the physicians: a stable therapeutic dose was achieved 3.7 days earlier (p=0.002), fewer patients were overanticoagulated (10% versus 41%), and the predicted maintenance dose was in the therapeutic range in 85% of the computer-dosed patients versus 42% of the physician group (p<0.002). For physicians who did not routinely manage warfarin therapy, computer-assisted dosing improved the accuracy of dosing and shortened the time required to achieve a stable therapeutic dose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wessler S, Gitel SN. Warfarin: from bedside to bench. N Engl J Med 1984;311:645–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hull R, Delmore T, Gentone E, et al. Warfarin sodium versus low-dose heparin in the long-term treatment of venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1979;301:855–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kelton JG, Hirsh J. Bleeding associated with antithrombotic therapy. Semin Hematol 1980;17:259–91

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Forfar JC. Prediction of hemorrhage during long-term oral coumarin anticoagulation by excessive prothrombin ratio. Am Heart J 1982;103:445–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Husted S, Andreasen F. Problems encountered in long-term treatment with anticoagulants. Acta Med Scand 1976;200:379–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher CM. Anticoagulant therapy in cerebral thrombosis and cerebral embolism. Neurology 1961;11:119–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Reilly A, Aggeler PM. Determinants of the response to oral anticoagulant drugs in man. Pharmacol Rev 1970;22:35–96

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Deykin D. Current status of anticoagulant therapy. Am J Med 1982;72:659–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brozovic M. Oral anticoagulants in clinical practice. Semin Hematol 1978;15:27–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Koch-Weser J, Sellers EM. Drug interactions with coumarin anticoagulants. N Engl J Med 1971;285:547–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Routledge PA, Davies DM, Bell SM, Cavanagh JS, Rawlins MD. Predicting patients’ warfarin requirements. Lancet 1977;ii:854–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller DR, Brown MA. Predicting warfarin maintenance dosage based on initial response. Am J Hosp Pharm 1979;36:1351–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sawyer WT, Poe TE, Canaday BR, et al. Multicenter evaluation of six methods for predicting warfarin maintenance-dose requirements from initial response. Clin Pharm 1985;4:440–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fennerty A, Dolben J, Thomas P, et al. Flexible induction dose regimen for warfarin and prediction of maintenance dose. Br Med J 1984;228:1268–70

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson R, James AH. Computer assisted management of warfarin treatment. Br Med J 1984;289:422–4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sawyer WT, Finn AL. Digital computer-assisted warfarin therapy: comparison of two models. Comput Biomed Res 1979;12:221–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Theofanous TG, Barile RG. Multiple-dose kinetics of oral anticoagulants: methods of analysis and optimized dosing. J Pharmacol Sci 1973;62:261–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Svec JM, Coleman RW, Mungall DR, Ludden TM. Bayesian pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic forecasting of prothrombin response to warfarin therapy: preliminary evaluation. Ther Drug Monit 1985;7:174–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sheiner LB, Beal S, Rosenberg B, Marathe VV. Forecasting individual pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1979;26:294–305

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mungall DR, Ludden TM, Marshall J, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of racemic warfarin. J Pharmacol Biopharm 1985;13:213–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sheiner LB, Rosenberg B, Marathe VV. Estimation of population characteristics of pharmacokinetic parameters from routine clinical data. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1977;5:445–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Murray WE, McWaters DS, Coleman RW, Ludden TM, Mungall DA. Pharmacodynamics of warfarin. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1985;34:215 (abstr)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sheiner LB, Beal SL. Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1981;9:503–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pollock BE. Clinical experience with warfarin (Coumadin) sodium, a new anticoagulant. JAMA 1955;154:1094–7

    Google Scholar 

  25. O’Reilly A, Aggeler PM. Studies on coumarin anticoagulant drugs: initiation of warfarin therapy without a loading dose. Circulation 1968;38:169–77

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vozeh S, Muir KT, Sheiner LB, Follath F. Predicting individual phenytoin dosage. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1981;9:131–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kelman BW, Bryson S. OPT: a package of computer programs for parameter optimization in clinical pharmacokinetics. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1982;14:247–56

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hull R, Hirsh J, Jay R, et al. Different intensities of oral anticoagulant therapy in the treatment of proximal vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1982;307:1676–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Simpson RJ. Warfcalc. Ann Intern Med 1985;103:973

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

White, R.H., Hong, R., Venook, A.P. et al. Initiation of warfarin therapy. J Gen Intern Med 2, 141–148 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596140

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596140

Key words

Navigation