Skip to main content
Log in

Dose individualisation in patients with renal insufficiency: does drug labelling support optimal management?

  • Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

An important information source for pharmacotherapy in populations at risk is drug labelling. We compared the recommendations for patients with renal insufficiency included in German drug labellings with evidence from the literature.

Methods

From the 120 drugs with the highest turnover in a large university hospital, all drugs with pharmacokinetics independent of renal function (n=48) and those with substantial accumulation in renal failure (n=28) were identified. For both groups of compounds, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects relevant for dose individualisation in those with renal insufficiency were extracted from the literature and compared with the information given in the German drug labelling.

Results

Over half of the labellings (15 of 26) of non-accumulating drugs without renal adverse drug reactions contained no dose recommendation for patients with renal insufficiency. The labelling of nephrotoxic compounds that do not accumulate included more frequently a recommendation to adapt the dose or to monitor than the labelling of drugs without nephrotoxic potential (15 of 22 versus 5 of 26, P=0.002). For over half of accumulating drugs (16 of 28), the dose given in the labelling depends primarily on creatinine clearance. The ratio between the labelling dose and the dose based on the pharmacokinetic concept to achieve identical plasma concentrations (Q 0 concept) differed widely (0.4–2).

Conclusions

When renal failure had no impact on dosing, information was often missing. Such information is however important to differentiate, whether no dose adaptation is necessary or no information is available. If dose adjustment is required, application of a uniform concept is desirable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, Petersen LA, Small SD, Servi D, Laffel G, Sweitzer BJ, Shea BF, Hallisey R, Vander Vliet M, Nemeskal R, Leape LL (1995) Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. JAMA 274:29–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergk V, Gasse C, Schnell R, Haefeli WE (2004) Requirements for a successful implementation of drug interaction information systems in general practice: results of a questionnaire survey in Germany. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 60:595–602

    Google Scholar 

  3. Connelly DP, Rich EC, Curley SP, Kelly JT (1990) Knowledge resource preferences of family physicians. J Fam Pract 30:353–359

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dettli L (1984) The kidney in pre-clinical and clinical pharmacokinetics. Jpn J Clin Pharmacol Ther 15:241–254

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dettli L (1996) Pharmakokinetische Daten für die Dosisanpassung. In: Grundlagen der Arzneimitteltherapie. Herausgegeben durch die Sektion Klinische Pharmakologie der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie. 14. Auflage. Basel: Documed, pp 13–21

  6. Dollery C (ed) (1999) Therapeutic drugs, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  7. European Commission (1999) A guideline on the summary of product characteristics. Final—revision 0. Available at: http://pharmacos.eudra.org/F2/eudralex/vol-2/C/SPCGuidRev0-Dec99.pdf. Accessed December 7, 2004

  8. FachInfo-Service, Fachinformationsverzeichnis Deutschland. BPI Service GmbH. http://www.fachinfo.de/. Accessed between 27 Feb 2003 and 30 Jan 2004

  9. Falconnier AD, Haefeli WE, Schoenenberger RA, Surber C, Martin-Facklam M (2001) Drug dosage in patients with renal failure optimized by immediate concurrent feedback. J Gen Intern Med 16:369–375

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jick H (1977) Adverse drug effects in relation to renal function. Am J Med 62:514–517

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Klasco RK (ed) DRUGDEX System. MICROMEDEX Inc. Greenwood Village, Colorado, versions used: first quarter 2003 – first quarter 2004

  12. Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN (1998) Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients. A meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA 279:1200–1205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marroum PJ, Gobburu J (2002) The product label: how pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics reach the prescriber. Clin Pharmacokinet 41:161–169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Medscape DrugInfo. http://www.medscape.com/druginfo. Accessed on 5 September 2003 and 21 April 2004

  15. Mullen WH, Anderson IB, Kim SY, Blanc PD, Olson KR (1997) Incorrect overdose management advice in the Physicians’ Desk Reference. Ann Emerg Med 29:255–61

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. National Kidney Foundation (NKF) Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) Advisory Board (2002) K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Kidney disease outcome quality initiative. Part 5. Evaluation of laboratory measurements for clinical assessment of kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 39:S76–S110

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pestotnik SL, Classen DC, Evans RS, Stevens LE, Burke JP (1993) Prospective surveillance of imipenem/cilastatin use and associated seizures using a hospital information system. Ann Pharmacother 27:497–501

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rajpal A, Reidenberg MM (2003) Drug labeling should be kept current. Clin Pharmacol Ther 73:4–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sortis, Prescribing Information of January 2003. In: FachInfo-Service, Fachinformationsverzeichnis Deutschland. BPI Service GmbH. http://www.fachinfo.de/. Accessed on 3 Nov 2003

  20. Spyker DA, Harvey ED, Harvey BE, Harvey AM, Rumack BH, Peck CC, Atkinson AJ Jr, Woosley RL, Abernethy DR, Cantilena LR (2000) Assessment and reporting of clinical pharmacology information in drug labeling. Clin Pharmacol Ther 67:196–200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Taeschner W, Vozeh S (1997) Pharmacokinetic drug data. In: Speight TM, Holford NHG (eds) Averyás drug treatment, 4th ed. adis International Appendix A, pp 1629–1664

  22. Vioxx, Prescribing Information of August 2003. In: FachInfo-Service, Fachinformationsverzeichnis Deutschland. BPI Service GmbH. http://www.fachinfo.de/. Accessed 13 Nov 2003

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Peter Martin for excellent programming of the Access database which was used for evaluation of evidence. V.B. was supported by the Graduiertenkolleg 793 (German Research Foundation, DFG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter E. Haefeli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin-Facklam, M., Rengelshausen, J., Tayrouz, Y. et al. Dose individualisation in patients with renal insufficiency: does drug labelling support optimal management?. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 60, 807–811 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-004-0852-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-004-0852-y

Keywords

Navigation