Skip to main content
Log in

Attitudes to reporting medication error among differing healthcare professionals

  • Pharmacoeconomics
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

Medication error reporting is an important measure to prevent medication error incidents in a healthcare system and can serve as an important tool for improving patient safety. This study aimed to investigate attitudes of healthcare professionals (doctors, nurses, and pharmacists) in reporting medication errors.

Methods

Fifty-six healthcare professionals working at a 900-bed tertiary referral hospital were surveyed. A questionnaire using two different clinical scenarios (involving oral and intravenous administration of a drug) and four questions with an ascending order of worsening patient outcome was used. A Likert scale ranging from 1 (unlikely) to 5 (likely) was used to describe the likelihood of reporting a medication error.

Results

The overall response rate was 57% (43% for doctors, 68% for nurses, and 64% for pharmacists). Results showed that doctors were unlikely to report less-serious medication errors (median value of 2 on the Likert scale). Nurses and pharmacists (median value of 5) were likely to report less-serious as well as serious medication errors despite their fears of receiving disciplinary action. All healthcare professionals were more likely to report an error as the clinical scenarios had a progressively worsening outcome for the patient.

Conclusions

These results suggest that among healthcare professionals, there are differing attitudes to reporting medication errors. Differing approaches are therefore required to encourage medication error reporting among different healthcare professionals. Future study is required to further investigate these findings and improve reporting rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M (2001) Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ 322:517–519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker G, Norton P, Flintoft V, Blais R, Brown A, Cox J, Etchells E, Ghali W, Henert P, Mujumdar S, O’Beirne M, Palacios-Derflingher L, Reid R, Sheps S, Tamblyn R (2004) The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. JAMC 170(11):1678–1686

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas E, Studdert D, Runciman W, Webb R, Sexton E, Wilson R, Gibberd R, Harrison B, Brennan T (2000) A comparison of iatrogenic injury studies in Australia and the USA. Int J Qual Health Care 12(5):371–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shaw R, Drever F, Hughes H, Osborn S, Williams S (2005) Adverse events and near miss reporting in the NHS. Qual Saf Health Care 14:279–283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aronson JK, Henderson G, Webb DJ, Rawlins MD (2006) A prescription for better prescribing. BMJ 333(7566):459–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ashcroft D, Morecroft C, Parker D, Noyce P (2006) Likelihood of reporting adverse events in community pharmacy: an experimental study. Qual Saf Health Care 15:48–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maidment I, Thorn A (2005) A medication error reporting scheme: analysis of the first 12 months. Psychiatri Bull 29:298–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sari AB, Sheldon TA, Cracknell A, Turnbull A (2007) Sensitivity of routine system for reporting patient safety incidents in an NHS hospital: retrospective patient case note review. BMJ 334(79):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davidoff F (2002) Shame: the elephant in the room. Qual Saf Health Care 11:2–3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Evans S, Berry J, Smith B, Esterman A, Selim P, O’Shaughnessy J, DeWit M (2006) Attitudes and barriers to incident reporting: a collaborative hospital study. Qual Saf Health Care 15:39–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Firth-Cozenes J (2002) Barriers to incident reporting. Qual Saf Health Care 11:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wolf Z, Serembus J, Smetzer J, Cohen H, Cohen M (2000) Responses and concerns of healthcare providers to medication errors. Clin Nurse Spec 14(6):278–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Alrwisan A, Ross J, Williams D (2009) Medication incidents reported to an online incident reporting system Proceedings of the British Pharmacological Society Clinical Pharmacology Section 16th–18th December 2009

  14. Yu K, Nation R, Dooley M (2005) Multiplicity of medication safety terms, definitions and functional meanings: when is enough enough? Qual Saf Health Care 14:358–363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank the medical, nursing and pharmacy staff of Aberdeen Royal Infirmary who participated in this study. We thank Mr. Tim Delaney for use of the questionnaire used in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Williams.

Appendices

Appendix I—Medical Staff Questionnaire

figure afigure a

Appendix II—Nursing Staff Questionnaire

figure bfigure b

Appendix III—Pharmacist’s Questionnaire

figure c

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarvadikar, A., Prescott, G. & Williams, D. Attitudes to reporting medication error among differing healthcare professionals. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 66, 843–853 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-010-0838-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-010-0838-x

Keywords

Navigation