Abstract
The autopsy has long been regarded as an important tool for clinical confrontation, education and quality assurance. The aims of this study were to examine the correlation between the clinical diagnosis and autopsy findings in adult patients who died in an intensive care unit (ICU) and to identify the types of errors in diagnosis to improve quality of care. Autopsies from 289 patients who died in the ICU during a 2-year period were studied. Post-mortem examination revealed unexpected findings in 61 patients (21%) including malignancy, pulmonary embolism, aspergillosis, myocardial or mesenteric infarction and unsuspected bacterial, viral or fungal infection. These unexpected findings were classified as Goldman class I errors in 17 (6%), class II in 38 (13%) and class III in six (2%) cases. Although the incidence of unexpected findings with clinical significance was low, post-mortem examination remains a valuable source of pertinent information that may improve the management of ICU patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology (1991) Recommendations on quality control and quality assurance in anatomic pathology. Am J Surg Pathol 15:1007–1009
Baker PB, Zarbo RJ, Howanitz PJ (1996) Quality assurance of autopsy face sheet reporting, final autopsy report turnaround time, and autopsy rates: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 10,003 autopsies from 418 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 120:1003–1008
Baron JH (2000) Clinical diagnosis and the function of the autopsy. J R Soc Med 93:463–466
Battle RM, Pathak D, Humble CG, Key CR, Vanatta PR, Hill RB, Anderson RE (1987) Factors influencing discrepancies between premortem and postmortem diagnoses. JAMA 258:339–344
Bauer FW, Robbins SL (1972) An autopsy study of cancer patients. I. Accuracy of the clinical diagnoses (1955 to 1965) Boston City Hospital. JAMA 221:1471–1474
Berlot G, Dezzoni R, Viviani M, Silvestri L, Bussani R, Gullo A (1999) Does the length of stay in the intensive care unit influence the diagnostic accuracy? A clinical-pathological study. Eur J Emerg Med 6:227–231
Blosser AS, Zimmerman HE, Stauffer JL (1998) Do autopsies of critically ill patients reveal important findings that were clinically undetected? Crit Care Med 26:1332–1336
Boers M, Nieuwenhuyzen Kruseman AC, Eulderink F, Hermans J, Thompson J (1988) Value of autopsy in internal medicine: a 1-year prospective study of hospital deaths. Eur J Clin Investig 18:314–320
Burton EC, Troxclair DA, Newman WP 3rd (1998) Autopsy diagnoses of malignant neoplasms: how often are clinical diagnoses incorrect? JAMA 280:1245–1248
Combes A, Mokhtari M, Couvelard A, Trouillet JL, Baudot J, Hénin D, Gibert C, Chastre J (2004) Clinical and autopsy diagnoses in the intensive care unit: a prospective study. Arch Intern Med 164:389–392
Dhar V, Perlman M, Vilela MI, Haque KN, Kirpalani H, Cutz E (1998) Autopsy in a neonatal intensive care unit: utilization patterns and associations of clinicopathologic discordances. J Pediatr 132:75–79
Dimopoulos G, Piagnerelli M, Berre J, Eddafali B, Salmon I, Vincent JL (2003) Disseminated aspergillosis in intensive care unit patients: an autopsy study. J Chemother 15:71–75
Dimopoulos G, Piagnerelli M, Berre J, Salmon I, Vincent JL (2004) Post mortem examination in the intensive care unit: still useful? Intensive Care Med 30:2080–2085
Egervary M, Szende B, Roe FJ, Lee PN (2000) Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of lung cancer in Budapest in an institute specializing in chest diseases. Pathol Res Pract 196:761–766
Fernandez-Segoviano P, Lazaro A, Esteban A, Rubio JM, Iruretagoyena JR (1988) Autopsy as quality assurance in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 16:683–685
Geha DJ, Roberts GD (1994) Laboratory detection of fungemia. Clin Lab Med 14:83–97
Goldman L, Sayson R, Robbins S, Cohn LH, Bettmann M, Weisberg M (1983) The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. N Engl J Med 308:1000–1005
Goldman L (1984) Diagnostic advances v the value of the autopsy. 1912–1980. Arch Pathol Lab Med 108:501–505
Gut AL, Ferreira AL, Montenegro MR (1999) Autopsy: quality assurance in the ICU. Intensive Care Med 25:360–363
Haber SL (1996) Whither the autopsy? Arch Pathol Lab Med 120:714–717
Herbrecht R, Denning DW, Patterson TF, Bennett JE, Greene RE, Oestmann JW, Kern WV, Marr KA, Ribaud P, Lortholary O, Sylvester R, Rubin Rh, Wingard JR, Stak P, Durand C, Caillot D, Thiel E, Chandrasekar PH, Hodges MR, Schlamm HT, Troke PF, De Pauw B, Invasive Fungal Infections Group of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Global Aspergillus Study Group (2002) Voriconazole versus amphotericin B for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis. N Engl J Med 347:408–415
Juvin P, Teissiere F, Brion F, Desmonts JM, Durigon M (2000) Postoperative death and malpractice suits: is autopsy useful? Anesth Analg 91:344–346
Kamal IS, Forsyth DR, Jones JR (1997) Does it matter who requests necropsies? Propective study of clinical audit on rate of requests. BMJ 314:1729
Kumar P, Taxy J, Angst DB, Mangurten HH (1998) Autopsies in children: are they still useful? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 152:558–563
Kumar P, Angst DB, Taxy J, Mangurten HH (2000) Neonatal autopsies: a 10-year experience. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 154:38–42
Landefeld CS, Chren MM, Myers A, Geller R, Robbins S, Goldman L (1988) Diagnostic yield of the autopsy in a university hospital and a community hospital. N Engl J Med 318:1249–1254
Lundberg GD (1996) College of American Pathologists Conference XXIX on restructuring autopsy practice for health care reform: let’s make this autopsy conference matter. Arch Pathol Lab Med 120:736–738
Lundberg GD (1998) Low-tech autopsies in the era of high-tech medicine: continued value for quality assurance and patient safety. JAMA 280:1273–1274
Marche C (1990) The autopsy and AIDS. Evaluation and perspectives. Ann Pathol 10:225–228
Marwick C (1995) Pathologists request autopsy revival. JAMA 273:1889–1891
McPhee SJ, Bottles K (1985) Autopsy: moribund art or vital science? Am J Med 78:107–113
McPhee SJ, Bottles K, Lo B, Saika G, Crommie D (1986) To redeem them from death. Reactions of family members to autopsy. Am J Med 80:665–671
McPhee SJ (1996) Maximizing the benefits of autopsy for clinicians and families. What needs to be done. Arch Pathol Lab Med 120:743–748
Mort TC, Yeston NS (1999) The relationship of pre mortem diagnoses and post mortem findings in a surgical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 27:299–303
Nadrous HF, Afessa B, Pfeifer A, Peters SG (2003) The role of autopsy in the intensive care unit. Mayo Clin Proc 78:947–950
Nichols L, Aronica P, Babe C (1998) Are autopsies obsolete? Am J Clin Pathol 110:210–218
O’Grady G (2003) Death of the teaching autopsy. BMJ 327:802–803
Ong AW, Cohn SM, Cohn KA, Jaramillo DH, Parbhu R, McKenney MG, Barquist ES, Bell MD (2002) Unexpected findings in trauma patients dying in the intensive care unit: results of 153 consecutive autopsies. J Am Coll Surg 194:401–406
Perkins GD, McAuley DF, Davies S, Gao F (2003) Discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in critically ill patients: an observational study. Crit Care 7:R129–R132
Potet F (1996) Autopsy. A method for evaluating the quality of care. Ann Pathol 16:409–413
Rao MG, Rangwala AF (1990) Diagnostic yield from 231 autopsies in a community hospital. Am J Clin Pathol 93:486–490
Roberts WC (1978) The autopsy: its decline and suggestion for its revival. N Engl J Med 299:332–338
Roosen J, Frans E, Wilmer A, Knockaert DC, Bobbaers H (2000) Comparison of premortem clinical diagnoses in critically ill patients and subsequent autopsy findings. Mayo Clin Proc 75:562–567
Salib E, Tadros G, Ambrose A (2000) Autopsy in elderly psychiatric inpatients: a retrospective review of autopsy findings of deceased elderly psychiatric inpatients in north Cheshire 1980–1996. Med Sci Law 40:20–27
Sarode VR, Datta BN, Banerjee AK, Banerjee CK, Joshi K, Bhusnurmath B, Radotra BD (1993) Autopsy findings and clinical diagnoses: a review of 1,000 cases. Human Pathol 24:194–198
Silfvast T, Takkunen O, Kolho E, Andersson LC, Rosenberg P (2003) Characteristics of discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses in the intensive care unit: a 5-year review. Intensive Care Med 29:321–324
Slavin G, Kirkham N, Underwood JCE, Molt JM, Hopkins A, Jackson BT, Windsor CWO (1991) The autopsy and audit. Report of the Joint Working Party of the Royal College of Pathologists, the Royal College of Physicians of London and the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Royal College of Pathologists, London
Sonderegger-Iseli K, Burger S, Muntwyler J, Salomon F (2000) Diagnostic errors in three medical areas: a necropsy study. Lancet 355:2027–2031
Start RD, Firth JA, Macgillivray F, Cross SS (1995) Have declining clinical necropsy rates reduced the contribution of necropsy to medical research? J Clin Pathol 48:402–404
Tai DY, El-Bilbeisi H, Tewari S, Mascha EJ, Wiedemann HP, Arroliga AC (2001) A study of consecutive autopsies in a medical ICU: a comparison of clinical cause of death and autopsy diagnosis. Chest 119:530–536
The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Autopsy Working Party (2004) The decline of the hospital autopsy: a safety and quality issue for healthcare in Australia. Med J Aust 180:281–285
Tse GM, Lee JC (2000) A 12-month review of autopsies performed at a university-affiliated teaching hospital in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 6:190–194
Twigg SJ, McCrirrick A, Sanderson PM (2001) A comparison of post mortem findings with post hoc estimated clinical diagnoses of patients who die in a United Kingdom intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 27:706–710
Yalamarthi S, Ridley S, Barker T (1998) Agreement between ante-mortem diagnoses, death certificates and post-mortem causes of death in critically ill patients. Clin Intensive Care 9:100–104
Yesner R, Robinson MJ, Goldman L, Reichert CM, Engel L (1985) A symposium on the autopsy. Pathol Annu 20:441–477
Acknowledgement
The authors declare that the experiments comply with the current laws of Belgium.
This work has been carried out with the support of grants awarded by the “Fondation Yvonne Boël” (Brussels, Belgium).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maris, C., Martin, B., Creteur, J. et al. Comparison of clinical and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients. Virchows Arch 450, 329–333 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-006-0364-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-006-0364-5