Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of clinical and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The autopsy has long been regarded as an important tool for clinical confrontation, education and quality assurance. The aims of this study were to examine the correlation between the clinical diagnosis and autopsy findings in adult patients who died in an intensive care unit (ICU) and to identify the types of errors in diagnosis to improve quality of care. Autopsies from 289 patients who died in the ICU during a 2-year period were studied. Post-mortem examination revealed unexpected findings in 61 patients (21%) including malignancy, pulmonary embolism, aspergillosis, myocardial or mesenteric infarction and unsuspected bacterial, viral or fungal infection. These unexpected findings were classified as Goldman class I errors in 17 (6%), class II in 38 (13%) and class III in six (2%) cases. Although the incidence of unexpected findings with clinical significance was low, post-mortem examination remains a valuable source of pertinent information that may improve the management of ICU patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology (1991) Recommendations on quality control and quality assurance in anatomic pathology. Am J Surg Pathol 15:1007–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker PB, Zarbo RJ, Howanitz PJ (1996) Quality assurance of autopsy face sheet reporting, final autopsy report turnaround time, and autopsy rates: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 10,003 autopsies from 418 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 120:1003–1008

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baron JH (2000) Clinical diagnosis and the function of the autopsy. J R Soc Med 93:463–466

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Battle RM, Pathak D, Humble CG, Key CR, Vanatta PR, Hill RB, Anderson RE (1987) Factors influencing discrepancies between premortem and postmortem diagnoses. JAMA 258:339–344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bauer FW, Robbins SL (1972) An autopsy study of cancer patients. I. Accuracy of the clinical diagnoses (1955 to 1965) Boston City Hospital. JAMA 221:1471–1474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Berlot G, Dezzoni R, Viviani M, Silvestri L, Bussani R, Gullo A (1999) Does the length of stay in the intensive care unit influence the diagnostic accuracy? A clinical-pathological study. Eur J Emerg Med 6:227–231

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Blosser AS, Zimmerman HE, Stauffer JL (1998) Do autopsies of critically ill patients reveal important findings that were clinically undetected? Crit Care Med 26:1332–1336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boers M, Nieuwenhuyzen Kruseman AC, Eulderink F, Hermans J, Thompson J (1988) Value of autopsy in internal medicine: a 1-year prospective study of hospital deaths. Eur J Clin Investig 18:314–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Burton EC, Troxclair DA, Newman WP 3rd (1998) Autopsy diagnoses of malignant neoplasms: how often are clinical diagnoses incorrect? JAMA 280:1245–1248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Combes A, Mokhtari M, Couvelard A, Trouillet JL, Baudot J, Hénin D, Gibert C, Chastre J (2004) Clinical and autopsy diagnoses in the intensive care unit: a prospective study. Arch Intern Med 164:389–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dhar V, Perlman M, Vilela MI, Haque KN, Kirpalani H, Cutz E (1998) Autopsy in a neonatal intensive care unit: utilization patterns and associations of clinicopathologic discordances. J Pediatr 132:75–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dimopoulos G, Piagnerelli M, Berre J, Eddafali B, Salmon I, Vincent JL (2003) Disseminated aspergillosis in intensive care unit patients: an autopsy study. J Chemother 15:71–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dimopoulos G, Piagnerelli M, Berre J, Salmon I, Vincent JL (2004) Post mortem examination in the intensive care unit: still useful? Intensive Care Med 30:2080–2085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Egervary M, Szende B, Roe FJ, Lee PN (2000) Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of lung cancer in Budapest in an institute specializing in chest diseases. Pathol Res Pract 196:761–766

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fernandez-Segoviano P, Lazaro A, Esteban A, Rubio JM, Iruretagoyena JR (1988) Autopsy as quality assurance in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 16:683–685

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Geha DJ, Roberts GD (1994) Laboratory detection of fungemia. Clin Lab Med 14:83–97

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldman L, Sayson R, Robbins S, Cohn LH, Bettmann M, Weisberg M (1983) The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. N Engl J Med 308:1000–1005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldman L (1984) Diagnostic advances v the value of the autopsy. 1912–1980. Arch Pathol Lab Med 108:501–505

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gut AL, Ferreira AL, Montenegro MR (1999) Autopsy: quality assurance in the ICU. Intensive Care Med 25:360–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Haber SL (1996) Whither the autopsy? Arch Pathol Lab Med 120:714–717

    Google Scholar 

  21. Herbrecht R, Denning DW, Patterson TF, Bennett JE, Greene RE, Oestmann JW, Kern WV, Marr KA, Ribaud P, Lortholary O, Sylvester R, Rubin Rh, Wingard JR, Stak P, Durand C, Caillot D, Thiel E, Chandrasekar PH, Hodges MR, Schlamm HT, Troke PF, De Pauw B, Invasive Fungal Infections Group of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Global Aspergillus Study Group (2002) Voriconazole versus amphotericin B for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis. N Engl J Med 347:408–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Juvin P, Teissiere F, Brion F, Desmonts JM, Durigon M (2000) Postoperative death and malpractice suits: is autopsy useful? Anesth Analg 91:344–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kamal IS, Forsyth DR, Jones JR (1997) Does it matter who requests necropsies? Propective study of clinical audit on rate of requests. BMJ 314:1729

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kumar P, Taxy J, Angst DB, Mangurten HH (1998) Autopsies in children: are they still useful? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 152:558–563

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kumar P, Angst DB, Taxy J, Mangurten HH (2000) Neonatal autopsies: a 10-year experience. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 154:38–42

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Landefeld CS, Chren MM, Myers A, Geller R, Robbins S, Goldman L (1988) Diagnostic yield of the autopsy in a university hospital and a community hospital. N Engl J Med 318:1249–1254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lundberg GD (1996) College of American Pathologists Conference XXIX on restructuring autopsy practice for health care reform: let’s make this autopsy conference matter. Arch Pathol Lab Med 120:736–738

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lundberg GD (1998) Low-tech autopsies in the era of high-tech medicine: continued value for quality assurance and patient safety. JAMA 280:1273–1274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Marche C (1990) The autopsy and AIDS. Evaluation and perspectives. Ann Pathol 10:225–228

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Marwick C (1995) Pathologists request autopsy revival. JAMA 273:1889–1891

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. McPhee SJ, Bottles K (1985) Autopsy: moribund art or vital science? Am J Med 78:107–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. McPhee SJ, Bottles K, Lo B, Saika G, Crommie D (1986) To redeem them from death. Reactions of family members to autopsy. Am J Med 80:665–671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. McPhee SJ (1996) Maximizing the benefits of autopsy for clinicians and families. What needs to be done. Arch Pathol Lab Med 120:743–748

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mort TC, Yeston NS (1999) The relationship of pre mortem diagnoses and post mortem findings in a surgical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 27:299–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nadrous HF, Afessa B, Pfeifer A, Peters SG (2003) The role of autopsy in the intensive care unit. Mayo Clin Proc 78:947–950

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nichols L, Aronica P, Babe C (1998) Are autopsies obsolete? Am J Clin Pathol 110:210–218

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. O’Grady G (2003) Death of the teaching autopsy. BMJ 327:802–803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ong AW, Cohn SM, Cohn KA, Jaramillo DH, Parbhu R, McKenney MG, Barquist ES, Bell MD (2002) Unexpected findings in trauma patients dying in the intensive care unit: results of 153 consecutive autopsies. J Am Coll Surg 194:401–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Perkins GD, McAuley DF, Davies S, Gao F (2003) Discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in critically ill patients: an observational study. Crit Care 7:R129–R132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Potet F (1996) Autopsy. A method for evaluating the quality of care. Ann Pathol 16:409–413

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Rao MG, Rangwala AF (1990) Diagnostic yield from 231 autopsies in a community hospital. Am J Clin Pathol 93:486–490

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Roberts WC (1978) The autopsy: its decline and suggestion for its revival. N Engl J Med 299:332–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Roosen J, Frans E, Wilmer A, Knockaert DC, Bobbaers H (2000) Comparison of premortem clinical diagnoses in critically ill patients and subsequent autopsy findings. Mayo Clin Proc 75:562–567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Salib E, Tadros G, Ambrose A (2000) Autopsy in elderly psychiatric inpatients: a retrospective review of autopsy findings of deceased elderly psychiatric inpatients in north Cheshire 1980–1996. Med Sci Law 40:20–27

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Sarode VR, Datta BN, Banerjee AK, Banerjee CK, Joshi K, Bhusnurmath B, Radotra BD (1993) Autopsy findings and clinical diagnoses: a review of 1,000 cases. Human Pathol 24:194–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Silfvast T, Takkunen O, Kolho E, Andersson LC, Rosenberg P (2003) Characteristics of discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses in the intensive care unit: a 5-year review. Intensive Care Med 29:321–324

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Slavin G, Kirkham N, Underwood JCE, Molt JM, Hopkins A, Jackson BT, Windsor CWO (1991) The autopsy and audit. Report of the Joint Working Party of the Royal College of Pathologists, the Royal College of Physicians of London and the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Royal College of Pathologists, London

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sonderegger-Iseli K, Burger S, Muntwyler J, Salomon F (2000) Diagnostic errors in three medical areas: a necropsy study. Lancet 355:2027–2031

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Start RD, Firth JA, Macgillivray F, Cross SS (1995) Have declining clinical necropsy rates reduced the contribution of necropsy to medical research? J Clin Pathol 48:402–404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Tai DY, El-Bilbeisi H, Tewari S, Mascha EJ, Wiedemann HP, Arroliga AC (2001) A study of consecutive autopsies in a medical ICU: a comparison of clinical cause of death and autopsy diagnosis. Chest 119:530–536

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Autopsy Working Party (2004) The decline of the hospital autopsy: a safety and quality issue for healthcare in Australia. Med J Aust 180:281–285

    Google Scholar 

  52. Tse GM, Lee JC (2000) A 12-month review of autopsies performed at a university-affiliated teaching hospital in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 6:190–194

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Twigg SJ, McCrirrick A, Sanderson PM (2001) A comparison of post mortem findings with post hoc estimated clinical diagnoses of patients who die in a United Kingdom intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 27:706–710

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Yalamarthi S, Ridley S, Barker T (1998) Agreement between ante-mortem diagnoses, death certificates and post-mortem causes of death in critically ill patients. Clin Intensive Care 9:100–104

    Google Scholar 

  55. Yesner R, Robinson MJ, Goldman L, Reichert CM, Engel L (1985) A symposium on the autopsy. Pathol Annu 20:441–477

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors declare that the experiments comply with the current laws of Belgium.

This work has been carried out with the support of grants awarded by the “Fondation Yvonne Boël” (Brussels, Belgium).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabelle Salmon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maris, C., Martin, B., Creteur, J. et al. Comparison of clinical and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients. Virchows Arch 450, 329–333 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-006-0364-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-006-0364-5

Keywords

Navigation