Skip to main content
Log in

Is laparoscopic cholecystectomy a mature operative technique?

Results of an ergonomic sequence analysis

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

More than 10 years after its introduction, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the method of choice for the treatment of cholecystolithiasis. However intraoperative difficulties with dramatic postoperative consequences have been reported. The aim of this study was to identify what role the two-dimensional view, the surgeon’s experience, the instruments, technical tools and their (time) influence exercised on the operation course in daily laparoscopic operations.

Methods

The operative times for 30 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were investigated by ergonomic sequence analysis and analyzed statistically with the use of the Wilcoxon test.

Results

Comparing experienced and less experienced surgeons, a significant difference in the duration of the operation was observed (56±24 min compared to 75 ± 13 min, p=0.025), especially in the laparoscopic intra-abdominal phase of the operation. The prolonged duration of the operation (15–20%) was mainly due to problems with the technical tools (40%) and the use of instruments (23.5%). Visualization had a minor influence (14.4%) on the duration of the operation, and the negative effect of the two-dimensional view (0.5%) was negligible. The last two factors did not cause any complications.

Conclusions

The recognized difficulties still cause a loss of time and in some cases complications, which can only partly be compensated by the surgeon’s experience. This leads to reluctance in the application of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in more complicated stages of the disease. Two-dimensional view satisfies the surgeon’s demands for a safe procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adamer K, Salzmann M, Imhof M, Zacherl J, Raduly F, Fugger R (1997) Postoperative benefit after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Zentralbl Chir 122: 287–290

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bueß GF, van Bergen P, Kunert W, Schurr MO (1996) Vergleichsstudie verschiedener 2-D und 3-D- Sichtsysteme in der minimal-invasiven Chirurgie. Chirurg 67: 1041–1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Claus GP, Sjoerdsma W, Jansen A, Grimbergen CA (1995) Quantitative standardised analysis of advanced laparoscopic procedures. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 3: 210–213

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Davidoff AM, Pappas TN, Murray EA (1992) Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 215: 196–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Deyo GA (1992) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 2: 41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Diebold M (1992) Anästhesiologische Aspekte bei der Laparoskopie. In: KH Fuchs, H Hamelmann, BC Manegold (eds) Chirurgische endoskopie im abdomen. Blackwell Wissenschaft, Berlin, pp 273–276

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fuchs KH, Freys SM, Schaube H, Hamelmann H (1992) Laparoskopische Cholezystektomie: Einführung und Etablierung einer neuen Methode. In: KH Fuchs, H Hamelmann, BC Manegold (eds) Chirurgische endoskopie im abdomen. Blackwell Wissenschaft., Berlin, pp 343–363

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gilliand TM, Traverso W (1990) Modern standards for comparison of cholezystectomy with alternative treatments for symptomatic cholelithiasis with emphasis on long term relief of symptoms. Surg Gynecol Obstet 170: 39–44

    Google Scholar 

  9. Keisuke A (1993) Abdominal wall retraction during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 17: 105–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirchner JH, Rohmert W (1973) Problemanalyse zur Erarbeitung eines arbeitswissenschaftlichen Instrumentariums für Tätigkeitsanalysen. In: Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildungsforschung Arbeitswissenschaftliche Studien zur Berufsbildungsforschung Gebr. Jänecke Verlag, Hannover, pp 7–48

    Google Scholar 

  11. Largiader F (1991) Neue operative und nichtoperative Möglichkeiten zur Behandlung von Gallenblasensteinen. Schweiz Rundsch Med 80: 318–321

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Larson WL, Simonet P (1992) Clinical measurement of depth perception by means of motion parallax: a case report. Optomal Vis Sci 69: 248–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McSherry CK (1992) Open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165: 435–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pier A, Götz F (1992) Laparoskopische Cholezystektomie: Indikationen und Komplikationen. In: KH Fuchs, H Hamelmann, BC Manegold (eds) Chirurgische endoskopie im abdomen. Blackwell Wissenschaft. Berlin, pp 380–399

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ponce J, Cutshall KE, Hodge MJ, Browder W (1995) The lost laparoscopic stone: potential for long-term complications. Arch Surg 130: 666–668

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Satava RM (1993) 3-D vision technology applied to advanced minimally invasive surgery systems. Surg Endosc 7: 429–431

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schietroma M, Carlei F, Ciuca B, Risetti A, Lannucci D, Leardi S, Muzi F, De-Santis C, Di-Placido R, Recchia CL, Maggi G, Simi M (1997) Video laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: when, how and why? Minerva Chir 52: 515–522

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schumpelick V, Schippers E (1991) Cholezystektomie: laparoskopisch oder konventionell? Z Gastroenterol 29: 659–662

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. von Pichler C, Rademacher K, Grablowitz V, Boekmann W, Rau G, Jakse G, Schumpelick V (1993) An ergonomic analysis of stereo-video-endoscopy, Proceedings of the 15th annual conference of the IEEE, San Diego, October 28–31, pp 1408–1409

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Online publication: 8 February 2002

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Welty, G., Schippers, E., Grablowitz, V. et al. Is laparoscopic cholecystectomy a mature operative technique?. Surg Endosc 16, 820–827 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-9019-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-9019-4

Key words

Navigation