Skip to main content
Log in

Technical skills errors in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by expert surgeons

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background:

Performing laparoscopic surgery involves a complex cascade of cognitive skills, which may inherently have a constant technical error rate. We assess generic and specific minor and major error rates in laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCs) performed by consultant surgeons.

Methods:

Checklists of generic (11) and specific technical minor (six) and major events (eight) were devised for LCs. Two experienced surgeons assessed each full-length operation blindly and independently.

Results:

A total of 37 LCs were performed by eight consultants. There were no major intraoperative or postoperative complications. Mean inter-rater reliability was κ = 0.91 (range 0.80–0.98) for each of the error categories. Error rates were generic (27/407) 6.6%, minor (59/222) 26.6%, and major (8/296) 2.7%, respectively. There was a significant statistical difference between the minor error group and the other groups, p ≤ 0.05.

Conclusions:

Performing laparoscopic surgery may always have a background technical error rate. Our present study demonstrates a migration of surgical technical errors in expert laparoscopic surgeons. The surgeons migrate technically when they execute a high rate of procedure-specific minor errors. However, when it comes to the major fundamental aspects of the operation, they dynamically adapt and migrate away from performing major technical errors. We aim to continue the study to increase cases, assess trainees as well, and also explore other factors that may affect the surgeon when executing surgical technical tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P Barach SD Small (2000) ArticleTitleReporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems Br. Med. J 320 759–763

    Google Scholar 

  2. R Berguer (1999) ArticleTitleSurgery and ergonomics Arch Surg 134 IssueID9 1011–1016 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.134.9.1011 Occurrence Handle10487599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. TA Brennan LL Leape NM Laird L Hebert AR Localio AG Lawthers JP Newhouse PC Weiler HH Hiatt (1991) ArticleTitleIncidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I N Engl J Med 324 370–376 Occurrence Handle1987460

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. DA Campbell SuffixJr SS Sonnad FE Eckhauser KK Campbell LJ Greenfield (2001) ArticleTitleBurnout among American surgeons Surgery 130 IssueID4 596–702 Occurrence Handle10.1067/msy.2001.116676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. P Davis R Lay-Yee R Briant W Ali A Scott S Schug (2002) ArticleTitleAdverse events in New Zealand public hospitals I: occurrence and impact NZ Med J 115 IssueID1167 U271

    Google Scholar 

  6. TR Eubanks RH Clements D Pohl N Williams DC Schaad S Horgan C Pellegrini (1999) ArticleTitleAn objective scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy J Am Coll Surg 189 IssueID6 566–574 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00218-5 Occurrence Handle10589593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. NK Francis GB Hanna A Cuschieri (2002) ArticleTitleThe performance of master surgeons on the Advanced Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester: contrast validity study Arch Surg 137 IssueID7 841–844 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.137.7.841 Occurrence Handle12093343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. TP Grantcharov L Bardram P Funch-Jensen J Rosenberg (2001) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic performance after one night on call in a surgical department: prospective study Br Med J 323 IssueID7323 1222–1223

    Google Scholar 

  9. A Green HL Duthie HL Young TJ Peters (1990) ArticleTitleStress in surgeons Br J Surg 77 IssueID10 1154–1158 Occurrence Handle2224465

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. P Joice GB Hanna A Cuschieri (1998) ArticleTitleErrors enacted during eridoscopic surgery—a human reliability analysis Appl Ergon 29 IssueID6 409–414 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00016-7 Occurrence Handle9796785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. JA Martin G Regehr R Reznick H MacRae J Murnaghan C Hutchison M Brown (1997) ArticleTitleObjective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents Br J Surg 84 IssueID2 273–278 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.02502.x Occurrence Handle9052454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. P Michel JL Quenon AM Sarasqueta Particlede O Scemama (2004) ArticleTitleComparison of three methods for estimating rates of adverse events and rates of preventable adverse events in acute care hospitals Br. Med J 328 IssueID7433 199

    Google Scholar 

  13. K Moorthy Y Munz A Dosis S Bann A Darzi (2003) ArticleTitleThe effect of stress-inducing conditions on the performance of a laparoscopic task Surg Endosc 7 IssueID9 1481–1484

    Google Scholar 

  14. J Reason (1995) ArticleTitleUnderstanding adverse events: human factors Quality Health Care 4 80–89

    Google Scholar 

  15. RA Shapiro (1972) ArticleTitleNoise in the operating room N Engl J Med 287 1236–1237 Occurrence Handle5084988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. NJ Taffinder IC McManus Y Gul RC Russell A Darzi (1998) ArticleTitleEffect of sleep deprivation on surgeons’ dexterity on laparoscopy simulator Lancet 352 IssueID9135 1191 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(98)00034-8 Occurrence Handle9777838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. EJ Thomas DM Studdert HR Burstin EJ Orav T Zeena EJ Williams et al. (2000) ArticleTitleIncidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado Med Care 38 261–271 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005650-200003000-00003 Occurrence Handle10718351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. C Vincent G Neale M Woloshynowych (2001) ArticleTitleAdverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review Br. Med J 322 517–519

    Google Scholar 

  19. RM Wilson WB Runciman RW Gibberd BT Harrison L Newby JD Hamilton (1995) ArticleTitleThe Quality in Australian Health Care Study Med J Aust 163 IssueID9 458–471 Occurrence Handle7476634

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. www.jchst.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. K. Sarker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarker, S.K., Chang, A., Vincent, C. et al. Technical skills errors in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by expert surgeons. Surg Endosc 19, 832–835 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-9174-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-9174-5

Keywords

Navigation